August 13, 2025
Students’ views on smartphone bans

In recent years, banning or restricting children’s access to smartphones and social media has grasped the attention of policy makers, schools and parents. A number of countries, including France, Turkey, Norway, Sweden, and regions of the US and Canada have introduced laws, policies or guidance for schools to ‘ban’ or heavily restrict the use of phones. Within Ireland, in 2024, the Minister for Education announced her intention to introduce smartphone bans in post-primary schools, whilst at the same time acknowledging that individual schools are best placed to decide on the scope and scale of restrictions for their students.
Whilst these bans aim to protect children from harm, and teachers often anecdotally report seeing benefits, evaluations of existing research highlight a lack of evidence on their efficacy. At the moment, we simply don't know enough about the impact of bans. Evidence is hampered by the fact that technological developments and technology use is moving at a faster pace than research. Some studies suggest that bans are beneficial to academic outcomes and mental wellbeing. Others suggest no effects. However, many studies have methodological weaknesses, use small samples or retrospective data, and can't ascribe causal mechanisms.
Our latest Researcher of the Month, Dr Megan Reynolds, has recently published a paper which explores young people's perspectives and experiences of smartphone bans in their schools. Unlike most previous research, it centres student voices in this high profile issue.
Summary
The researchers carried out focus groups during the first year of full phone bans at a set of schools in Ireland. They spoke with 66 students, 44 girls and 22 boys aged between 10 and 18 years old. The schools that feature in the study were chosen as early adopters of full bans. Prior to full bans, most of the schools had policies which restricted phone use at certain times of the day.
Secondary and senior schools in the study had introduced various measures to keep students from looking at their phones. Some gave every student a locked pouch in which to place their smartphone at the start of each day. Students could then keep the pouch with them in their bag before unlocking it using a special device at the end of each day. Other schools required students to place their smartphones into clear boxes mounted on the outside of their lockers, which were locked with either a padlock or combination until the end of the day. Within primary settings, the schools in the study tended to implement voluntary codes, designed to encourage parents to delay smartphone acquisition, though children frequently accessed digital content at home via other family devices.
Whilst bans are implemented with the best intentions from school staff, it is clear that students in the study did not feel that their voices were included in decision-making and they expressed a desire to have a say in decisions on both this issue and other aspects of their school lives. Students in the study identified factors that they considered more pressing and important than phone bans, such as the state of school facilities and health issues.
Most students in the study welcomed some restrictions and support around phone use, but objected to the notion of a full ban. They felt that blanket bans implied that they weren't trusted to manage their own phone use during school hours appropriately. A prominent theme was a sense of injustice. Students felt that they were being punished for the actions of a few who might have misused previous, more lenient policies, and they didn’t think this was fair. The students felt a greater sense of division with school staff. Spot checks, where teachers checked bags and ensured that pouches were closed, compounded this sense of mistrust, and impacted on student/teacher communication. Some students also referenced a perceived double standard or hypocrisy in behaviour, noting that teachers also cause distractions to the learning environment with their phone use.
The interviews revealed that the stricter the phone ban, the more students looked for ways to subvert it. Once a ban was in place, students reported actively seeking ways around it. They also said they felt more preoccupied with their phones than they had been before the ban.
One rationale behind bans is to reduce anxiety and distraction that might be caused by repeated notifications throughout the school day. However, some of the young people in this study, who had previously been able to contact their parents or carers if they wished, reported that being unable to do so created feelings of anxiety and vulnerability.
Students said they were told that reducing cyberbullying was a key reason for phone bans, but they neither understood nor accepted this rationale. Most reported no personal experience of cyberbullying and were unaware of it being an issue in their schools before the ban. They felt that banning phones in school would not stop cyberbullying, as it was more likely to occur outside school hours, a view supported by research showing that most cyberbullying happens outside of school hours.
Importantly, students argued that smartphone bans do not teach self-regulation or prepare them for life beyond school, where no one will manage their phone use for them. They felt that under previous, more flexible rules, where using a phone in class led to its removal, they learned more about when phone use was appropriate.
What did students suggest instead of bans?
Students suggested that schools should consider more flexible phone policies, noting that different learners have different needs (a view supported by international research). They favoured rules that trust students to keep phones in their bags, with clear guidelines and fair consequences for misuse. They also strongly highlighted the need for education on navigating the digital world safely, recognising harmful content or cyberbullying, and knowing what to do if they encounter it. They felt that if money was being spent on pouches and boxes for bans (pouches cost around 20 euros per student), it would be better spent on digital literacy education.
Implications
What can schools do?
Implement any new strategy only after thoughtful consideration. It’s important to consider what inadvertent impact phone bans might have on school culture, pupil-teacher relationships, mutual trust and respect, and individual students’ needs.
Remember that teachers and pupils value nuances in policies. A nuanced and well thought out policy can cater for different demographics of pupils, different ways of learning, different approaches and different levels of education.
Consult students meaningfully and act on their feedback. While many have valuable suggestions and want to be heard, some in the study felt that non-anonymous surveys or casual questions were tokenistic, unlikely to spark change, and could have personal repercussions. Genuine consultation means creating safe spaces for open discussion, not just requesting feedback without follow-through. Dr Reynolds suggests that creative workshops can be an effective way to boost engagement. Students are generally aware that phones could be distracting in lessons and would like more support to use them appropriately, but feel that blanket bans are unfair. The Lundy Model of Child Participation is a helpful framework involving children and young people meaningfully in decision making.
Remember that bans do not address essential digital literacy needs. Carefully consider what a meaningful digital literacy curriculum should include. Students in the study often found existing lessons boring, irrelevant or out of date. Why not survey your student body to identify content they will value? Within Dr Reynolds' study, students wanted to feel armed with practical skills for real situations.
Try to keep up with the research. New evidence is constantly emerging. Make an effort to keep pace with it, rather than making decisions based on conjecture. Tooled Up can help here!
And at home?
Remember that open communication is key. Your children are likely to be having very different digital experiences to you, and a very different childhood to the one that you remember. Chat with them about their online world, ask them about their experiences, lean in, and keep going with conversations, even if they feel tricky. Talking to children about what they are engaging with will help to encourage critical thinking and hopefully promote a stronger likelihood of them opening up if they need help or see something that upsets them.
Use devices together. Co-using, such as browsing social media or watching YouTube with your child, can spark natural, non-judgemental conversations about what they see and whether it is appropriate.
Ask your child how platforms work. Many young people in the study felt that they were more knowledgeable about social media and other digital platforms than their parents. Use this as an opportunity to start conversations. Ask them to show you features and give you advice.
Tooled Up members can listen to our interview with Dr Megan Reynolds here. Remember, if you are a Tooled Up member, you also have access to our whole platform, which is packed with evidence-based resources designed to support children in the digital world.

Dr Megan Reynolds
Postdoctoral Researcher at the Anti-Bullying Centre at Dublin City University
Dr Megan Reynolds is a postdoctoral researcher at the Anti-Bullying Centre at Dublin City University. She's working on the Cilter DTIF project, which focuses on the detection of cyberbullying, self-harm, suicide-related and grooming content for the development of Cilter technology. Previously, Dr Reynolds was a postdoctoral research fellow in the School of Psychology at University College Dublin, where she worked on a project investigating COVID-19 misinformation. She obtained her PhD from Queen's University Belfast and her PhD thesis investigated unwanted sexual experiences, mental health impacts, alcohol use and consent on university campuses in Northern Ireland. Prior to her PhD, Dr Reynolds obtained an MSc in Forensic Psychology at the University of Central Lancashire.
Dr Megan Reynolds
Postdoctoral Researcher at the Anti-Bullying Centre at Dublin City University
Related Resources
Scroll our research gallery

Jul 14, 2025
Do teens with mental health conditions use social media differently than their peers?
As Luisa Fassi, our new Researcher of the Month, comments, "The link between social media use and youth mental health is hotly debated, but hardly any studies look at young people already struggling with clinical-level mental health symptoms". In fact, Luisa's large systematic review and meta-analysis found that only 11% of papers published on the topic since 2007 focused on young people with clinical conditions. Her review also showed that the data used to evidence mental health conditions in these existing studies is not always strong or especially robust. Many report links between social media and mental health on the basis of short self-report questionnaires, where young people are asked about symptoms. Whilst this wasn't found as part of Luisa's review, it is also the case that very few papers in the field differentiate between different mental health conditions, or examine different symptoms or conditions (such as anxiety, ADHD or eating disorders) in isolation. To address this research gap, Luisa and colleagues have recently published a fascinating and nuanced paper. It analyses both quantitative and qualitative dimensions of social media use from a nationally representative survey of 3,340 teens in the UK aged between 11 and 19 years old, which was conducted by NHS Digital in 2017. Rather than gathering mental health data from self-report questionnaires, the young people in the survey underwent a full clinical screening, which included interviews with the young people, their parents and teachers. Information about social media use came from questionnaires completed by participants. They were not asked about specific platforms. Luisa used this data to gather novel insights into how social media and mental health are related in teens who both meet and do not meet diagnostic criteria for a wide range of mental health conditions. The study does not establish any causal links, but it does reveals a range of differences between young people with and without mental health conditions when it comes to social media.

Jun 17, 2025
Navigating the feed: younger adolescents' reflections on algorithmically curated social media
Our latest researcher of the month, Roxana Pomplun, has investigated the interactions, experiences and perceptions of younger adolescents, aged 11, 12, and 13, with algorithmically curated platforms such as TikTok, YouTube Shorts, Spotlight on Snapchat and Reels on Instagram. These kinds of platforms use algorithms to personalise and tailor feeds, harnessing user data to suggest content that the individual is most likely to be interested in and engage with. As such, young people have little control over what they are seeing in their feeds. Tech companies are not yet required to be transparent about the data that they are collecting, but it tends to include demographic information such as age, gender or location, along with use patterns. Whilst these sites dominate the digital lives of tweens and teens, until now they have received little dedicated research attention, particularly in relation to younger users, with most existing studies focusing on older teens. Whilst we know that most social media platforms have age limits of 13, we also know that many younger children are active users, particularly of algorithmically curated platforms like TikTok and YouTube Shorts. Given that early adolescence is a life phase marked by critical neurological development, identity development and heightened susceptibility to mental health issues, deepening our understanding of how younger adolescents engage with social media is vital. Roxana's qualitative research, where a group of young people eloquently explore their own experiences and perceptions, broadens our knowledge of social media use within an age group that appears increasingly aware of the digital influences shaping their online experiences, yet which is still in need of support to fully navigate these ecosystems.

May 15, 2025
Looking beyond smartphone bans
Over the last year or so, there has been a surge in public concern around smartphones and social media. Banning or restricting children’s access to smartphones and social media has grasped the attention of policy makers, schools and parents. A number of countries, including France, Turkey, Norway, Sweden, and regions of the US and Canada have introduced laws, policies or guidance for schools to ‘ban’ or heavily restrict the use of phones. In the UK, there are proposals to raise the age of ‘internet adulthood’ from 13 to 16, and to ban smartphones in schools. The third reading of a private members’ bill on this topic will be heard in parliament in July. Whilst these bans aim to protect children from harm, recent studies highlight a lack of evidence on their efficacy. Along with a team of international experts, our latest Researcher of the Month, Professor Victoria Goodyear, argues that, in isolation, banning smartphone and social media access fails to equip children for healthy use of technology. She suggests that there is a need to shift debates, policies and practices away from a sole focus on restricting smartphone and social media access, toward an emphasis on nurturing children’s digital skills for healthy technology use, and a rights-respecting approach which is underpinned by age-appropriate design and education.

Apr 22, 2025
Encouraging adventurous play in the preschool years
Tune into our podcast interview with April's researchers of the month here. As well as providing numerous opportunities for exploration, joy, and expression, outdoor and adventurous play - the type of play that allows children to take age-appropriate risks - is associated with a range of positive health behaviours and outcomes. Yes, we're talking about the kind of play that might leave us adults with our hearts in our mouths at times, as children start to disappear up a tree, or engage in a rough and tumble game of chase. But its benefits are wide-ranging and known impacts include increased levels of habitual physical activity alongside better mental health and positive mood. In 2019, Dr Hesketh was involved in the creation of physical activity guidelines in the UK, which explicitly note the importance of outdoor play for children in the preschool age group. We know quite a lot about the play habits of school-aged children, but until now, have had significantly less data on their younger counterparts. Our Researchers of the Month, Dr Kathryn Hesketh and Professor Helen Dodd set out to discover how much time preschool-aged children spend playing in a range of indoor and outdoor spaces, and how adventurously they are playing within them. In the first national survey of play in children of this age, they asked over 1000 parents of two to four year olds about their children’s play habits, finding that, on average, children aged two to four spend around four hours per day (outside of educational settings) playing. Just under 50% of this was spent playing outdoors. Their findings shed interesting light on some inequalities in play, even in the youngest age group, which may exacerbate existing inequalities in health.

Mar 17, 2025
Fostering a school culture against bullying: the KiVa Programme
Bullying is an extremely important public mental health risk. Around one in five primary school children report being bullied at least weekly. Children who are bullied are more likely to experience depression and anxiety, and are at heightened risk of mental health issues in adolescence and adulthood. Whilst schools in England and Wales are required to have anti-bullying policies, rates of bullying remain high. Bullying is preventable, but schools need more help to tackle it. Typically, school policies focus on how to handle bullying once it happens. However, evidence suggests that a comprehensive approach involving the entire school to prevent bullying, alongside clear strategies for addressing confirmed cases, is the most effective way to tackle the issue. KiVa is one such whole-school approach, developed in Finland by Professor Christina Samivalli. A large study in Finland which involved 28,000 primary school pupils found that adopting the KiVa programme in Finnish schools significantly reduced bullying and improved children's mental wellbeing. The programme has since been rolled out nationally by the Finnish government and ongoing use of KiVa in Finnish schools is associated with year-on-year incremental reductions in bullying. Along with colleagues, our researcher of the month, Professor Judy Hutchings OBE, has tested the effectiveness of the KiVa Programme in UK primary schools. The study involved over 11,000 children in Wales, Birmingham, Oxfordshire and Devon, and showed a 13% reduction in reported rates of bullying when compared with existing school approaches to tackle bullying.

Feb 12, 2025
When is the right age? Searching for age-appropriate ways to support children's online lives
Currently, children's and young people’s use of digital technology is rarely out of the news. Age limits are debated. Calls for stronger limits are made, and questions are raised regarding whether society should ban 'under-age' children from various aspects of the digital world. 13 years of age is often cited as a digital 'age of consent', though this varies in some countries. Commonly used age limits are largely arbitrary, based primarily on US legislation, rather than evidence. In a recent paper, our researcher of the month, Dr Kim Sylwander, and her co-author Professor Sonia Livingstone, consider age milestones and evaluate whether or not the evidence supports them. Are age limits the optimal way to regulate children’s digital experiences? Does it matter that they are widely contested and often poorly implemented? And are common boundaries even the “right” age, according to evidence from the field of children and digital media? Dr Sylwander persuasively argues that moving forward, a developmental approach can better support children’s rights.

Jan 14, 2025
Showing faith and trust in children nurtures integrity
A new study which explores the development of trust and integrity in children has found that expressing trust in young children encourages them to behave honesty. The research team, including our researcher of the month, Professor Li Zhao, studied whether children were less likely to cheat in a simple test of counting accuracy if the adult administering the test had previously conveyed trust in them. They found that children who were trusted cheated less than those who were not trusted. These findings provide novel evidence about the causal effect of trust on the development of children's honesty.

Dec 17, 2024
Intrinsic reward and word learning
From infancy onwards, humans display an innate motivation to acquire language and to communicate. We start acquiring words as babies and continue to do so throughout our lives. In fact, children are thought to learn over 3000 new words each year. However, relatively little work has focused on why we are motivated to learn words, particularly when it comes to adolescents. Adolescence is a period of great neurological change and sensitivity to learning. It's also marked by changes in reading behaviours. Whilst children become skilled readers between the ages of 10 and 18, this period is also associated with motivational changes in reading, with teens frequently showing a disinclination to read for pleasure. This change often coincides with the transition from primary to secondary school. Policy makers are keen to motivate adolescents to read for pleasure, arguing that it would improve not just literacy outcomes, but also result in substantial economic and societal benefit. Recent research has shown that adults find learning words to be intrinsically rewarding, and that this intrinsic reward facilitates the entrance of new words into long-term memory. In their latest paper, our researchers of the month, Professor Saloni Krishnan and Professor Pablo Ripollés, set out to establish whether the same is true for children and teens.

Nov 14, 2024
Delivering effective menstrual education
Research has shown that menstruation and menstrual cycle symptoms can be disruptive and detrimental to physical, mental and social wellbeing. As many as 93% of teen girls experience dysmenorrhea (severe cramps) and girls with a typical cycle experience 11 menstrual cycle-related symptoms on average, potentially including mood changes, stomach cramps and increased levels of anxiety and fatigue. Adolescents with problematic symptoms have reported a negative impact on school attendance, behaviour, confidence around peers and participation in physical activity. In the United Kingdom, evidence suggests that menstrual health education delivered by teachers generally focuses on menstrual cycle biology, as opposed to management of menstruation and menstrual cycle related symptoms. Our latest researcher of the month, Dr Natalie Brown, set out to understand young people’s perceptions of menstrual education in schools and their experiences of menstruating whilst at school, including within physical education. Her study involved nine focus groups with 10-15 year old female pupils attending primary and secondary schools across England and Wales. Pupils highlighted that, in their experience, menstrual education is limited and noted that the menstrual cycle impacts negatively on their school experience, affecting participation in sport and school attendance generally. Participants highlighted a need for more support and information regarding understanding and managing periods in school.

Oct 17, 2024
How influential is social media on young people's mental health?
A significant body of evidence tells us that young people's mental health has decreased over time, and a potential link between social media use and this mental health decline has triggered wide interest and concern. Research into social media use and mental health is being conducted at a rapid pace but, so far, findings are far from conclusive. Our new Researcher of the Month, Dr Margarita Panayiotou, adds to this body of work. She led a team of researchers who recently published a study involving thousands of young people in the UK. It set out to explore the interplay between social media use and teens' mental health, wellbeing and social life, and found that when considering the complex combination of multiple factors, things such as a lack of family support are arguably more important for adolescent mental health than social media use.