Dr Caoimhe Dempsey

We already know that children's relationships with their parents and teachers contribute to their school adjustment and achievement, and that positive, close relationships with adults are really important for a wide variety of children’s outcomes. However, few studies have examined interactions between these relationships or sought to address the nuances of children’s experiences in terms of how different relationships have different impact or influence.

To address this, along with colleagues, our new Researcher of the Month, Dr Caoimhe Dempsey, has recently published an 

 which aims to examine the links between children's relationships with their mothers, fathers and teachers, and three domains of school adjustment: academic achievement, academic self-concept and behavioural adjustment in the classroom. By examining a range of data, the researchers sought to find out whether some children are more susceptible to the effects of the quality of their relationship with their teacher.

Dr Caoimhe Dempsey is a postdoctoral researcher in Education at the 

 in Ireland. Her research examines child, family and school factors that influence children's adjustment and school experiences. Dr Dempsey's work bridges the fields of developmental and educational psychology and aims to provide tangible policy and practice implications. She holds a PhD and MRes in Developmental Psychology from the University of Cambridge and a Ba in Psychology from Trinity College Dublin. She has recently co-authored a book with Professor Claire Hughes and Dr Elian Fink called 

The Psychology of Starting School: An Evidence-Based Guide for Parents and Teachers

 examines child, family and school factors that influence children's adjustment and school experiences. Along with her co-authors, she has recently published an 

 which examines how young children's relationships with their parents and teachers contribute to their school adjustment and achievement.

How Do Young Children’s Relationships with Parents and Teachers Impact Their Adjustment to School?

Dr Aurelie Lange

Supporting children to successfully transition from primary to secondary or senior school is vitally important. It's a big life change, which can leave both parents and children feeling excited and nervous in equal measure. At Tooled Up, we often use the analogy of a journey for the transitional experience. In fact, anyone who has attended or watched a talk with our founder, Dr Kathy Weston, is likely to have heard her say that we'd all want our children to be well prepared for any journey they go on, and that, as loving parents and carers, we wouldn't dream of sending them off on any journey without the right equipment, mindset and strategies to reach their destination safely and securely. Transition to a new school is no different.

Research shows that there are numerous holistic protective factors that can help to ease transition. Conversely, it's also the case that problems with successfully transitioning to secondary school and subsequent lower levels of school connectedness are associated with lower education outcomes, school drop-out, higher levels of depression and anxiety, and increased involvement in criminal, violent and antisocial behaviour. Research also shows that these difficulties may not be equal across different socio-demographic variables, with children from underserved communities (including those from minority ethnic backgrounds and lower socio-economic status) and children with behavioural difficulties facing greater challenges during the transition to secondary school. It's therefore important for all parents and educators to consider how to make this transition as seamless as possible.

Along with her co-authors, our Researcher of the Month, Dr Aurelie Lange, has published a 

 which evaluates the efficacy of a new UK-based online intervention called Level Up. In it, Dr Lange seeks to explore families' experiences of facilitators and barriers to engagement and change. 

Dr Aurelie Lange studied Pedagogical Sciences at Utrecht University and completed her PhD in 2018 at Erasmus MC in Rotterdam. She works as a researcher at the Youth Care research group on various projects. Before this, she worked at various mental health/youth care institutions in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, and has conducted qualitative and quantitative research into the effectiveness and implementation of interventions for young people and families.

Dr Aurelie Lange works as a researcher at the Youth Care research group on various projects. Along with her co-authors, she has recently published a 

 exploring factors that might help or hinder children when transitioning from primary to secondary school. 

Supporting children's transition to secondary school

Dr Kasia Kostyrka-Allchorne

Over the last decade, digital developments have led to major changes in the ways that teens learn, work, play and interact with others. Digital access is a daily reality for most children and young people. Nine in 10 children in the UK now own a smartphone by the time they reach the age of 11, and the large majority of children aged 11 now use social media (78%) and have a social media profile (72%), despite being younger than the minimum age requirement for many platforms. By the time teens are 17 years old, 97% will use social media.

Coincident with this change, adolescent mental health problems have also increased in prevalence. It is therefore no surprise that much research has focused on the relationship between digital experiences and adolescent mental health. However, comparatively few studies have directly compared the experiences of teens with mental health conditions meaning that some key questions remain unanswered. Do adolescents with pre‐existing mental health conditions differ in terms of why and how they engage with the digital world compared to peers without such difficulties? Are specific mental health conditions linked to different patterns of digital usage? What role do such differences play in the development and escalation of these conditions?

, our Researcher of the Month, Dr Kasia Kostyrka-Allchorne, and her colleagues, explore what the evidence shows about the digital experiences of teens with mental health vulnerabilities.

 is a developmental psychologist and lecturer in the Department of Psychology at Queen Mary University of London. Broadly, she researches the risks and opportunities of growing up in a digital world. Her current research cuts across the disciplines of child and adolescent development, mental health, clinical interventions, and human-computer interactions. She works on large, cross-institutional research projects that come under two main strands.

The first strand focuses on gathering evidence of whether digital interventions can provide a solution to the growing problem of the lack of psychological support for parents, who may have a difficult time bringing up their children. Within this strand, Dr Kostyrka-Allchorne works with parents, clinicians, app developers and other researchers on developing and testing digital applications supporting parents both in the community as well as in the clinical services.

Second, she is involved in the work of the 

 study, which investigates whether, why, and for whom digital engagement is a risk or protective factor for mental health. This strand of research aims to provide a comprehensive characterisation of the associations between adolescent digital activity and mental health and identify some of their underpinning mechanisms.

Find Dr Kostyrka-Allchorne’s research here

Dr Kasia Kostyrka-Allchorne researches the risks and opportunities of growing up in a digital world.

The impact of digital experiences on teens with mental health vulnerabilities

Dr Gill West

Oral language skills provide the foundation for formal education, yet many children enter school with language weaknesses. Oral language is fundamental to children’s overall development and educational success. It is linked to all higher level cognitive skills and is pivotal for literacy development, and education more generally. It’s also vitally important for children’s social and emotional development.

The term oral language refers to a complex set of skills that should ideally work seamlessly together to enable children to communicate with others by producing and understanding language. It’s an umbrella term, encompassing numerous component skills which include having a good vocabulary and the grammatical ability to combine words effectively to convey meaning, along with an understanding of cause and effect, memory skills and the ability to plan what to say and what not to say.

Language skills develop rapidly between the ages of 3–6 years making preschool an excellent time to intervene to support language development. Because of this, Dr Gill West and her colleagues – as part of a team headed by Professor Charles Hulme – have developed and 

 of a new language enrichment programme, the 

Nuffield Early Language Intervention—Preschool (NELI Preschool)

, which is delivered to children the year before they enter formal education. The programme combines language enrichment for all children, with additional targeted support for those with language needs, potentially narrowing the gap in language skills associated with social disadvantage.

 is Lecturer in Language Sciences: Development and Disorders at University College London. Before taking up this role in 2023, she was a Research Fellow and Lecturer in Child Development and Education at the Department of Education at the University of Oxford. Her research focuses on language assessment and intervention in children, including large-scale randomised control trials of school-based language interventions. Recent projects include evaluations of the Nuffield Early Language intervention (NELI), the development of an online teacher training and support model for the programme to enable delivery at scale and the subsequent rollout of NELI to over 10,000 schools between 2020 to 2022, funded by the DfE as part of its Covid 19-recovery effort. She was also part of the development team behind LanguageScreen (www.languagescreen.com), an app used in schools to assess the language skills of children aged 3-8 years. She is now involved in the development and evaluation of a new early language enrichment programme for children in nursery. A successful efficacy trial funded by the Nuffield Foundation has been completed and recruitment of nurseries for the next stage of the research – a large-scale effectiveness trial funded by EEF – is underway. 

In addition to her academic role, Gill is also one of the Directors of a University of Oxford spin out company, OxEd and Assessment Ltd, created to translate research into children’s language and reading difficulties into practical applications. Gill completed her PhD at UCL, combining an interest in both memory and language to investigate the relationship between memory processes and language in children.

Dr Gill West is Lecturer in Language Sciences: Development and Disorders at University College London. Her research focuses on language assessment and intervention in children, including large-scale randomised control trials of school-based language interventions. 

NELI Preschool: a new oral language enrichment programme for preschools and nurseries

Dr Julie Moote

Does school-based careers education, advice, information and guidance (CEAIG) have any influence on later life outcomes? A body of research has shown that careers education and activities can play an important role in helping young people to prepare for and navigate transitions into the world of work. It has also shown that the quality and quantity of provision can vary considerably, with those who are most socially disadvantaged experiencing the least and lowest quality provision. However, until now, the impact of careers education on later life outcomes has remained unclear.

A new paper written by Dr Julie Moote and colleagues seeks to find out what relationship there is between young people’s perceptions of the quality and quantity of school-based careers activities and education experienced at the age of 14–16 and their outcomes several years later, when they are 21–22. Findings are discussed in the light of recent legislation relating to careers support in England, which highlights how important it is to ensure that the needs of all young people transitioning into the workforce and adulthood are met.

 started out as a science teacher, but has been an academic researcher for a decade and is now a freelance research and evaluation consultant. Her most significant project has been the ASPIRES investigation. ASPIRES was a huge longitudinal study which followed a cohort of students over a 13 year period – from primary school leavers, through to university graduates and young people transitioning into the world of work – investigating how their aspirations for education, and then work, in STEM-related disciplines formed and developed over time. The findings of this project have been reported to Parliament and are informing government policies on how to encourage more young people to get into STEM careers. Broadening the pursuit of STEM is one of Julie’s main passions – particularly making STEM a safer and more inclusive space for people of all backgrounds and characteristics. And she is also very interested in how inquiry-based learning programmes can help to inspire budding scientists.

 started out as a science teacher, but has been an academic researcher for a decade and is now a freelance research and evaluation consultant. Her most significant project has been the ASPIRES investigation

"More is more”: the impact of careers education on later outcomes

Dr Sona Kumar

In the US, as in numerous countries including the UK, female and non-White students are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and maths (STEM) fields. A significant body of research demonstrates significant gender disparities in STEM achievement, participation and attitudes from early childhood, and that these continue to widen as children get older. Children are strongly influenced by their early environments and conversations with adults. Whilst gendered messages around STEM are now rarely explicit – children are unlikely to be told that girls can’t be scientists – they may receive more subtle messages about representation and belonging. These differences may contribute to children’s beliefs about their own STEM ability, their performance in STEM activities, and their decision to pursue a career in STEM.

US researcher, Dr Sona Kumar, and her colleagues sought to explore whether there are subtle differences in the messages that preschool educators send girls and boys about STEM. Previous, older research with caregivers found that parents tended to provide more scientific explanations to boys than to girls. Studies have also found that, within classroom settings, boys often receive more attention from teachers on science-related subjects than girls. Dr Kumar predicted that teachers would direct more scientific questions to boys than girls and tested this by observing a preschool setting.

 is a postdoctoral researcher at Purdue University studying how the messages that adults like parents and teachers communicate about who belongs in STEM impacts children’s STEM motivation in early childhood. She works in the 

Dr Kumar’s research focuses on children’s STEM motivation in early childhood.

STEM in preschool settings: do teachers’ scientific questions differ by child gender?

Dr Mariya Stoilova

Policymakers and technology companies promote the use of parental control tools to ensure children’s safety in our digital age. In recent years, there has been considerable industry investment in this new generation of technical child protection measures, designed to help parents and carers to control what their children see and do online. Some of these tools operate at the level of the device (such as a phone or tablet). Other tools are embedded into specific services, such as Snapchat, or streaming services such as Netflix. Others work at the level of the operating system, such as IOS, Android or Windows, or are provided by your broadband company.

Control tools vary in functionality. Some allow parents to limit the amount of time that children spend on a device or particular app. Others can track their child’s location. Internet filters block certain categories of content (violence, adult content or gambling, for example), or specific websites. There are other tools that track children’s online activity (search history, online purchases or activity logs, for example) and provide reports or real-time alerts to parents. Some tools track activity and interactions on social media platforms and can limit children’s contact with unknown users.

But how many families actually make use of them, and do they work? Our Researcher of the Month, Dr Mariya Stoilova, and her colleagues, reviewed all available evidence in a 

 is a post-doctoral researcher at the Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). Her area of expertise is at the intersection of child rights and digital technology with a particular focus on the opportunities and risks of digital media use in the everyday lives of children and young people. She works also on data and privacy online, digital literacy, pathways to online harm, mental health and wellbeing. Dr Stoilova has spent the last 10 years researching and publishing on these issues.

Dr Stoilova’s research focuses on the opportunities and risks of digital media use in the everyday lives of children and young people.

Do parental controls work and what are the pros and cons?

Dr Francesca Solmi

We know that more adolescents are experiencing depressive symptoms than in the past, but we don’t yet know precisely why. Noting a need to understand modifiable risk factors for depression, which could inform future preventative work, our researcher of the month, Dr Francesca Solmi, and her team, have recently published new and novel findings about the impact of high BMI and body dissatisfaction on children’s later mental health. They “found strong longitudinal evidence that a high BMI in childhood is linked with an increased risk of depressive symptoms multiple years later” and discovered that body dissatisfaction accounts for a significant proportion of this link, finding strong evidence that being unhappy with one’s appearance at the age of 11 is linked with increased depressive symptoms during the teen years.

 is a Principal Research Fellow in the Division of Psychiatry at UCL. She is an epidemiologist by background and her research mostly focuses on understanding risk factors for eating disorders in young people and the role of body dissatisfaction in causing adolescent mental health difficulties. She is currently leading a programme of research trying to understand if and how some environmental risk factors, such as schools and social media, can contribute to body dissatisfaction and eating disorder risk in young people, so that we can develop preventative interventions to improve mental health in adolescents.

Dr Solmi’s research mostly focuses on understanding risk factors for eating disorders in young people and the role of body dissatisfaction in causing adolescent mental health difficulties.

BMI, body dissatisfaction and depression: positive steps forward

Professor Amelia Lake

We’ve all seen the vast array of colourful cans and bottles in the supermarket. Perhaps you are a fan yourself. But did you know that, in 2020, the energy drinks market was worth $45.8 billion globally? It is a large and expanding market, projected to grow at an annual rate of 8.2%, and reach a whopping $108.40 billion by 2031. Despite the fact that these products typically contain very high levels of both caffeine and sugar, and warnings on labels that they are ‘not recommended for children’, they are 

In fact, if you have offspring of a certain age, you are likely aware that 

, a product popularised on social media. Initially, Prime was a hydration drink, but the range has since expanded to include an energy drink containing caffeine. It became so popular among teens that bottles were spotted selling for £18 in some shops (and more on resale sites), despite the recommended retail price being only £2.99.

Research from a few years ago had already found that up to a third of children in the UK consume caffeinated energy drinks on a weekly basis and ranked young people in the UK as the 

 of energy drinks in Europe for their age group. 13% identified as high chronic consumers – having energy drinks four to five times a week, or more.

Published today (15th January), the most comprehensive evidence review to date has found that consuming energy drinks is associated with a wide range of risks, including increased risk of mental health issues among children and young people.

Our researcher of the month, Professor Amelia Lake, along with co-author Dr Shelina Visram and the rest of the team at FUSE (the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health) at Teesside University and Newcastle University, examined data from 57 studies of over 1.2 million children and young people from more than 21 countries. The study’s findings build on earlier research and highlight numerous risks associated with energy drinks.

 is a dietitian and public health nutritionist at Teesside University. Amelia is Associate Director of Fuse, The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health (

) and is the Fuse lead on the NIHR School of Public Health research theme ‘Health Places, Healthy Planet’. Amelia’s research involves transdisciplinary collaborations to examine how the environment interacts with individual behaviours. Her current work is around healthy planning policy, food insecurity, energy drinks, workplace health, food systems, school food environments, the obesogenic environment and knowledge exchange. Amelia has extensive experience of working with policy makers, practitioners, non-specialist audiences as well as academics, and has produced training programmes as well as short films. Amelia also runs a small charity called The David Ashwell Foundation funding research into a rare lung diseases affecting newborn babies in memory of her son David.

Professor Lake’s research focuses healthy planning policy, food insecurity, energy drinks, workplace health, food systems, school food environments, the obesogenic environment and knowledge exchange.

New study links energy drinks to mental health problems in young people

Anda Solea

You may well have heard of incels (involuntary celibates). Following several violent attacks associated with the ideology, this subgroup of the ‘manosphere’ has recently received a significant amount of 

. Once mostly contained on niche men’s forums, incel communities and theories are gaining prominence on mainstream social media platforms.

The incels are an online community whose members define themselves by their inability to form or access sexual relationships with women. They believe that society is stratified according to physical attractiveness. Women and attractive men are privileged, and unattractive men (like them) are excluded from sexual or romantic relationships. The ‘black pill’ ideology maintains that unattractive men cannot escape their romantic fate because their unattractiveness is pre-determined by genetic factors. Incels believe that their physical traits are substandard and that they are therefore discriminated against by women based on their physical appearance. Misogynistic incels believe that this social structure has been created by women and encouraged by feminists. They consider women to be privileged, entitled, lookist and promiscuous, and believe that women always choose the most physically attractive men and exclude those who are less attractive, using pseudoscience and evolutionary psychology to reinforce their claims.

Whilst previous research considerably enhanced our understanding of the incel phenomenon and their presence on Reddit and secluded incel forums, incel’s presence on mainstream social media platforms is understudied and their presence on TikTok is yet to be addressed. Our Researcher of the Month, Anda Solea, is hoping to fill this research gap and has recently co-authored a paper on the incel subculture on TikTok. It examines the presence and spread of misogynistic narratives linked to incels on TikTok and YouTube aims to identify the mechanisms that drive engagement to such content.

 is a PhD researcher in the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of Portsmouth. She completed a joint honours BSc in Criminology and Psychology at the University of Southampton and an MSc in Social and Organisational Psychology at the University of Exeter. Her PhD thesis examines the presence and spread of misogynistic narratives perpetuated by incels (involuntary celibates) on TikTok and YouTube. She aims to identify the mechanisms that drive engagement to such content and to raise awareness about the role mainstream social media platforms play in the spread of harmful ideologies responsible for the perpetuation of problematic gender stereotypes and violence against women.

Anda’s research focuses on the presence and spread of misogynistic narratives perpetuated by incels on TikTok and YouTube.

Researcher of the Month

Schools and businesses

Let's get started