February 09, 2023
Does gaming heavily have a negative impact on teens’ wellbeing?
In recent decades, there has been a shift to screen-based and web-based gaming activity. This has led to concerns in commentaries and the popular press about how gaming might affect children and teens. Despite decades of research into gaming and related psychosocial effects, questions remain about how best to identify what degree or context of gaming may be a cause for concern.
Along with her team, our Researcher of the Month, Dr Simona Skripkauskaite, aimed to classify young gamers into ‘gamer profiles’ based on their gaming behaviours and wellbeing, and distinguish between those engaging in adaptive versus maladaptive gaming patterns.
Results indicate that, whilst a substantial proportion of teens now spend much of their free time playing video games, for the vast majority gaming does not impact negatively on their wellbeing and is not related to mental ill-health. A small and important subgroup are more likely to show signs of problematic gaming and lower wellbeing. These are more likely to be girls who are gaming on their phones.
Summary
“The majority of young people spending much of their time gaming seem to be experiencing few negative effects with regard to their wellbeing.”
Dr Skripkauskaite used data from the OxWell Student Survey which asks 9-18 year old students in England over 200 questions on a range of wellbeing and mental health measures. In the June/July 2021 data collection, 12,725 participants from school years 8-13 answered questions on gaming. 3970 (31.2%) of these teens indicated that they played games on an electronic device for at least 3.5 hours a day.
As previous research suggests that over four hours of daily digital engagement or video gaming is more likely to indicate impaired psychosocial functioning, only those participants who played games for at least 3.5 hours per day were asked more detailed questions for inclusion in Dr Skripkauskaite’s study. These teens were asked how much they game on their phone and computer, their experiences with games in the preceding six months (the impact on their mood, levels of tolerance, any problems or conflicts), their mental wellbeing and some personal characteristics and experiences, including their age, gender, potential family risk factors, school experiences. They were also asked about specific gaming behaviours such as playing late at night, gambling or spending money on in-game purchases.
From this data, Dr Skripkauskaite distinguished six types of heavy gamers and found that most experienced no concurrent issues of concern with their wellbeing or mental health. Reassuringly, 44% of the sample was found to be adaptive computer gamers. Though they gamed a lot (on computers more than on phones), they had a medium level of control over their gaming and had the highest levels of wellbeing, higher, in fact, than some children who reported not gaming at all. For this large group of teens, gaming seems to be a healthy activity even when they play for multiple hours per day. This correlates with a growing body of recent evidence from large-scale studies showing that direct negative links between the amount of time a teens spends engaging with digital technology and their wellbeing or mental health are either nonexistent or weak.
However, the study also highlights individual differences. There are known to be a small proportion of teens (2% – 9%) who do exhibit ‘problematic’ gaming behaviours, such as impaired self-regulation and a loss of control over their gaming. This kind of problematic gaming is known to correlate with lower wellbeing, aggressive behaviours, depression, loneliness and poor sleep quality. In this study, 6% of gamers were categorised as ‘maladaptive computer gamers’ and a further 2% were categorised as ‘maladaptive phone gamers’. These teens had poor control over their gaming and low levels of wellbeing, particularly the teens playing games a lot on their phones. The maladaptive phone gamers were mostly female. They were also more likely to report high levels of anxiety and having experienced abuse or neglect.
Gaming is increasing in popularity among girls and other studies have shown that female gamers predominantly play on their mobile phones, rather than computers or consoles. It’s possible that female gamers who struggle with lower wellbeing because of previous traumatic experiences seek out phone gaming as a coping mechanism. Previous research has shown that extrinsic or escapist motives, rather than playing for fun, are more likely to relate to negative gaming consequences. Further research is required to understand causal mechanisms and Dr Skripkauskaite notes that it is important to learn more about the groups of teens with poor control of gaming and co-occurring low levels of wellbeing in order to support them if their difficulties become significant.
Implications
“Findings suggest that certain groups of gamers are at greater risk for co-occurring gaming and wellbeing issues.”
Implications for parents
Parents are often concerned about the amount of time that their children spend on screens. It’s reassuring to remember that, whilst many children and teens choose to game a lot, in and of itself, this doesn’t seem to be impacting negatively on the wellbeing of most individuals. However, significant phone gaming, particularly in girls, may be linked with poorer mental health. If you are concerned that your child is gaming excessively or problematically, try to focus on the gaming as a symptom, rather than the cause of any issues. Consider their motivations for gaming a lot. Are they enjoying social time with friends online or are they gaming alone for hours? What sort of games are they playing? Can you join in and play too? What else is going on in their lives? Lean into their experiences and open up lines of communication.
Implications for mental health practitioners
Rather than targeting time spent playing video games, using video gaming as a tool presents an opportunity for more affordable and less stigmatising mental health interventions for teens.
Dr Simona Skripkauskaite
Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of Oxford.
Dr Simona Skripkauskaite works for Oxford’s Co-SPACE study (COVID-19: Supporting Parents, Adolescents and Children During Pandemics) and the OxWell Student Survey, where she has been focusing on effects of gaming and social media on adolescent mental health. Dr Skripkauskaite also leads a project on ‘Learning from the trajectories of mental health challenges for children, young people and parents over the course of the Covid-19 pandemic’, which will compare how families have been affected by the pandemic in the UK and Japan. Overall, her research to date has aimed to identify developmental processes underlying successful functioning, but has ranged across child and adolescent mental health, emotion regulation, and parent-child relationships, as well as neurodiversity, visual attention, and perception.
Dr Simona Skripkauskaite
Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of Oxford.
Related Resources
Scroll our research gallery
Nov 11, 2026
Improving Algorithmic Literacy
Social media algorithms shape what content we see, how often we encounter particular types of content, which combinations of content appear in our feeds and how these patterns develop over time. Our new Researcher of the Month, Dr Lizzy Winstone, describes this as ‘algorithmically structured exposure’. Understanding social media algorithms and how they work is an important tool for both adults and young people in having some control over the material we see online. Dr Winstone has been leading a large-scale project which has examined how teens understand and experience social media algorithms. Along with her team, she has published various papers and some fantastic free resources for school staff designed to inform algorithmic literacy and social media education.
Oct 14, 2026
How Self-Harm Content Reaches Young People Online
A recent study published by researchers at the University of Oxford’s Department of Psychiatry found that one in three young people had seen self-harm content online in the previous month. Among those exposed, nearly 55% had encountered it once or twice, 26.5% a few times and 18.5% had seen self-harm content several times. The research team, led by our new Researcher of the Month, Dr Holly Bear, analysed data from more than 32,000 students aged 11–18 who took part in the 2025 OxWell Student Survey in England. This is a large school-based survey which runs every two years across England, with participating schools concentrated particularly in Oxfordshire and Liverpool. It asks school students directly about their mental health, wellbeing and their lives more broadly, both online and offline, and provides a rich snapshot of what is happening in young people's lives at that moment. Nearly three-quarters (72.9%) of those exposed had encountered self-harm content through passive routes, without actively seeking it. Algorithmic feed suggestions were the most commonly reported route overall. Even many of the younger survey respondents had encountered content (around one in four 11-12 year olds in the previous month) despite most social media platforms currently having a minimum age of 13.
Sep 11, 2026
Whose Stories Make History? Teaching Black British History Through Billy Waters
What can we learn about a historical period when we shift our attention away from its most famous figures and look instead at a life that has largely been overlooked? Billy Waters is not a household name, but his life offers a fascinating route into questions of Black British history, identity, poverty, disability and representation. Teachers can now explore his story with students through Billy Waters: Songs from the Shadows, a set of free educational resources featuring a 20-page graphic novel and digital soundscape for young people aged 11–16. Born in the late eighteenth century, Billy Waters was a Black sailor and disabled veteran who later became a well-known street musician and performer in nineteenth-century London. His life provides a particularly rich lens through which to explore the society in which he lived, and the lives and experiences that have often received less attention in traditional accounts of the past. The Billy Waters Project brings together historians, artists and musicians (some of whom are our new Researchers of the Month) to explore his story in imaginative and accessible ways. Drawing on the limited and sometimes ambiguous evidence that survives about his life, the resources invite young people not only to learn about Billy, but also to think about how histories are constructed, whose stories are preserved and how power, identity and representation shape the way we understand the past.
Aug 14, 2026
Deepfakes and Damage: Helping Schools Respond to AI-Generated Image Abuse
When we hear the word 'deepfake', many of us might think of celebrities, political misinformation, or the kind of AI 'slop' that now features heavily on our social media feeds. We might be less likely to think about school pupils. Yet emerging research suggests that AI-generated sexual deepfakes are an issue that schools increasingly need to understand and be prepared to address. AI-facilitated abuse is a growing concern, with reports of deepfake imagery being used maliciously against both pupils and teachers. Whilst anyone can be targeted, research suggests that sexual deepfake abuse is strongly gendered, with girls and women disproportionately affected. Within UK schools, AI-facilitated image-based sexual abuse most commonly involves groups of boys taking existing photographs of female peers from social media and using generative AI tools to create fake nude images. There have also been reports of criminal gangs targeting schools, threatening to take publicly available images of children from school websites and social media and turn them into sexually explicit images for the purposes of blackmail. In the UK, producing this kind of material is a criminal offence, though globally, laws are not consistent. Whilst deepfake images are not real, the harm they cause is. Emotional, reputational and developmental consequences can be profound and anyone who experiences this form of abuse deserves to be taken seriously and supported. With her team, our latest Researcher of the Month, Professor Tanya Horeck, has recently published one of the first empirical studies to examine AI-generated sexual deepfakes within UK schools. Using qualitative data from interviews with secondary school staff and pupils at eight UK schools, Professor Horeck explored what young people and school staff understand about sexual deepfakes, how schools are currently responding, teachers' confidence and preparedness and what support schools need. The findings revealed significant gaps in knowledge and understanding, alongside a strong appetite among both students and teachers for more information, guidance and education. It's important to note that, as an early qualitative study in a rapidly developing area, the research involved only a small number of participants and was designed to explore experiences and perspectives rather than establish how widespread particular views or practices are.
Jul 14, 2026
What Does Effective Drugs Education Look Like? Lessons from The Illicit Project UK
Our latest Researcher of the Month, Professor Harry Sumnall, is leading a team of researchers at Liverpool John Moores University to adapt and test a school drug prevention programme aimed at older teens (aged 15-18). The Illicit Project UK aims to develop teens' skills so that they can make healthier and safer choices when it comes to drug use, avoiding fear mongering approaches of the past that were designed to scare young people, and which we now know to be ineffective. The programme is fully aligned with the national RSHE curriculum in England and with the health and wellbeing curriculum in Scotland. This evidence-based approach is currently being tested in the North West of England and Scotland. The researchers are still looking for more schools, so if you work in a setting based in these areas and would like to be involved in the trial, please contact us and we'll put you in touch with the research team. You can find out more about what participation involves here.
Jun 16, 2026
Making Feedback More Motivating: Learnings from New Research
We often assume that positive feedback will always encourage people to keep trying hard. However, new research by our latest Researcher of the Month, Professor Nils Jostmann, and his co-author Professor Eddie Brummelman, suggests that praise and encouragement can sometimes have the opposite effect, and that how and when we give feedback really matters. Feeling positive about our progress on a task, or believing that we are doing better than we expected to, can sometimes act as a cue that less effort is needed, causing us to work less hard or 'coast'. Positive feedback may therefore have unintended consequences. Rather than spurring us on, it can sometimes encourage us to ease off because we feel confident that we are already doing well enough. Professor Jostmann's recent research sought to explore this further, examining whether the timing of positive feedback influences whether it boosts motivation or inadvertently undermines performance.
May 22, 2026
Reframing Masculinity: Tips for Parents and Teachers Supporting Boys
Dr King-Hill's research with young people has found that many many boys and young men today are grappling with how masculinity is defined and expressed, and many are struggling. In response, she has recently published We're In This Together, Reframing Masculinity for Young Boys and Men. This free, practical and accessible resource is designed for educators and parents or carers, and is packed with thoughtful guidance and realistic strategies to help the boys and young men growing up in our care to thrive. We'd recommend that all of our Tooled Up parents and educators download and read it.
Apr 14, 2026
Empowering young people to overcome low mood and boost wellbeing
Our latest researcher of the month, Professor Maria Loades, is currently seeking teens aged 13 - 17 to take part in a new study. Her Unlock Wellbeing trial will test the efficacy of digital, single session, self-help interventions, which have been designed to help young people in need of mental health support to feel more hopeful, more in control, and less sad or low. In the UK, there is currently a huge gap between the need for mental health support and access to help for young people. We know from a wide body of research that many young people feel unable to ask for help when experiencing depression symptoms. Whilst around 3% of young people are in contact with Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) at any point in time, this is only a very small percentage of those impacted by depression, anxiety or stress. In fact, at least one in three young people has at least some symptoms of depression, and one in 10 might meet the criteria for a mental health disorder. There are several reasons why many young people do not seek, or receive, the support they need. Adolescence is a time of growing independence, and many teens prefer to manage difficulties on their own, speak to friends or look online, rather than reach out to adults for help. Although stigma has reduced, concerns about how others might perceive them, and uncertainty about what support is available, can also hold them back. Practical barriers also play a role. School and clinic hours often overlap, and services are not always easily accessible. Alongside this, there is a shortage of trained therapists in the UK, leading to high thresholds for support and long waiting times, even for those who do seek help. Even more interestingly, of those young people who do seek formal support, almost 50% stop attending after just one session. Whilst one session may be sufficient for some, other young people may disengage due to practical challenges, or because the first session did not meet their expectations, even when further support was available. Given the shortcomings of the current model of support, research by Professor Loades and her team has identified a need for additional help that is scalable, barrier free and available on demand. After pilot tests, she's now planning a full randomised controlled trial to evaluate a series of self-guided, digital, single-session interventions for teens, and she's looking for volunteers. The interventions were originally developed by Professor Jessica Schleider in the Lab for Scalable Mental Health in the US, where they showed beneficial effects on symptoms of depression and anxiety as much as nine months after the intervention. They have been adapted by Professor Loades and colleagues for UK use.
Mar 12, 2026
The Universal Classroom: A New Free Screening Tool for Year 1 Teachers
Our latest Researcher of the Month, Professor Joel Talcott, is one of a team of researchers and educators who have worked on a new universal screener for all Year 1 children in the UK, which will be made freely available to all teachers this Autumn. Within the UK education system, formal identification of SEND typically involves ascribing diagnostic labels, such as dyslexia, dyscalculia or ADHD, based on under-attainment in one or more educational outcomes, compared with age-related expectations. However, access to assessment and diagnosis is challenging, and it is currently not equitable for all. The cost of missing children’s needs has serious personal consequences, as pupils underachieve due to unidentified barriers to learning. It also has wider and significant economic costs to society as a whole. Professor Talcott's new universal screener will address this issue. It offers a simple screening tool, which teachers are initially advised to use with all pupils during the first term of Year 1. Supported by government funding through a special educational needs innovation initiative, the Universal Classroom will be delivered via a freely accessible web platform, allowing any school or teacher to use it at no cost.
Feb 17, 2026
Children's Experiences of ADHD
While there have been many empirical studies of childhood ADHD, there have been few qualitative studies investigating first-hand accounts of the lived experiences of children. Much of the literature focuses on the perspectives of parents or teachers, rather than centring children’s voices. But what are children's thoughts, feelings and experiences? Our latest Researcher of the Month, PhD candidate Daphne Ling, has recently published findings which begin to address this research gap.