September 16, 2024
How do young children’s relationships with parents and teachers impact their adjustment to school?

We already know that children's relationships with their parents and teachers contribute to their school adjustment and achievement, and that positive, close relationships with adults are really important for a wide variety of children’s outcomes. However, few studies have examined interactions between these relationships or sought to address the nuances of children’s experiences in terms of how different relationships have different impact or influence.
To address this, along with colleagues, our new Researcher of the Month, Dr Caoimhe Dempsey, has recently published an article which aims to examine the links between children's relationships with their mothers, fathers and teachers, and three domains of school adjustment: academic achievement, academic self-concept and behavioural adjustment in the classroom. By examining a range of data, the researchers sought to find out whether some children are more susceptible to the effects of the quality of their relationship with their teacher.
Summary
"Teacher-child relationships in the first years of school have the potential to alter pre-existing influences and set the stage for future teacher-child relationships. Early school classrooms and curriculum should acknowledge this and prioritise fostering positive teacher-child relationships."
The research uses data from the Growing Up in Ireland study. This is a nationally representative, longitudinal study of approximately 7000 children in Ireland, which has been running for over 20 years. In the study, Dr Dempsey examined the quality of child-adult relationships at ages three and five, and teachers' reports of children's behavioural adjustment and academic achievement when they were nine years old.
Data from the Growing Up in Ireland study is unusual as it uses a multi-informant approach. Whilst, due to time and resource contraints, most studies only interview one parent (and generally this is mothers) the Growing Up in Ireland study gathers data from more than one parent in each family, including both mothers and fathers. Data was also gathered via interviews and questionnaires from teachers, headteachers and children themselves.
Whilst effect sizes were not large, after controlling for numerous variables, the study concluded that positive relationships between adults and young children impact on all elements of their school experiences and on all of the dimensions examined; academic, social, emotional and behavioural outcomes. The team found that teachers can shape and shift children's future trajectories and outcomes when they have a close and positive relationships, but that they have particular impact for some children.
The study suggests that children's initial teacher relationships interact with the effects of existing conflictual or problematic relationships with their mother. For children who lack an element of closeness or stability in their relationship with their mum, forming an intimate bond with a teacher when they start school can make a positive and significant difference to their school adjustment, and a close teacher relationship appears to compensate for the risks of low mother-child closeness. For children with strong, supportive relationships at home, teachers were not found to make such significant difference, as the trajectories for these children generally tend to be good already.
However, findings were not the same for dads! Children with a conflictual relationship with their father did not see these beneficial changes from a close relationship with their teacher, and the negative effects of the relationship with their fathers lasted into middle childhood, regardless of positive work happening at school. The current study provides first evidence of the longevity of the independent effect of father relationships through to middle childhood.
The reason for this difference requires further research. Dr Dempsey and co-authors posit that it could be linked to the fact that, in Ireland, a higher proportion of primary school teachers are female (85.8%), class sizes are small (which may mean teachers take on a more maternal role) or, compared with fathers, mothers may adopt a style of interacting with children that is more similar to teachers. For example, mothers traditionally spend more time fulfilling childcare duties, which may be more akin to the duties of a primary school teachers, whereas fathers engage in more unique play activities.
The study also suggests a "ceiling effect for adult-child closeness". Experiencing one close adult relationship was found to support children's behavioural adjustment and reading achievement. Interestingly, the additional benefit of a second close adult-relationship is limited; children who experience close relationships with both mothers and teachers show comparable outcomes at age nine to children with one close maternal relationship.
Implications
Implications for schools
"Teachers' influence can either provide a close relationship that mitigates earlier risk or expose children to conflict that pushes them past the point of resilience with their prior risk factors. These findings suggest that schools should focus their attention on identifying children exposed to higher relational risk and invest in forming positive teacher-child relationships with vulnerable children at school entry."
Bring parents in. Schools should give specific consideration to hard to reach families and think about strategies that might help to break down potential emotional barriers to school involvement. Opening up breakfast clubs to parents or having teachers or the head teacher welcoming families at the school gate can make school seem a much less scary or daunting place. Strategies like this can facilitate the formation of relationships with the whole families and create an ethos of inclusivity.
Engage with all parents. Ensure that all school information is sent to all people with parental / caring responsibilities and try - where there is a father - to keep them involved.
Get off on the right foot. Try to ensure that your first interactions with children get things off to a good start. This is especially important if children have behavioural challenges or relational difficulties.
Recognise individual differences in conversational styles. Some children will be very sociable, whilst others will be more reluctant. Listen actively and tap into what will bring out the best in each individual.
Confront any unconscious biases that you may have. We all have a tendency to interact more with ‘people like us’. Be aware of which children you might talk to more than others and consider whether all the children in your class receive individual attention. Ensure that every pupil feels equally valued in the classroom. It may be that having had the benefit of positive family experiences and role models, children coming from stable home environments are better able to interact with teachers. Because interactions with these children may feel smoother, tt can be easy to give them more time and attention.
Remember that children really value strong relationships. At this young age, when asked about their school experiences, children focus largely on their relationships with their friends and their teachers. Children tend to place more importance on these bonds than adults, who are often more caught up in academic learning.
Read lots more evidence-based tips in Dr Dempsey's new book. The Psychology of Starting School, which Dr Dempsey co-wrote with Professor Claire Hughes and Dr Elian Fink contains a vast quantity of actionable and clear advice for teachers to help children adjust well to the school environment.
Implications for parents
“Parents should make sure that they are filling their own buckets and that they have their own sources of social support, so that they are not just giving the whole time. It's very hard to come home with all the energy in the world to be the best parent that you can if you don’t have an independent outlet from all these things yourself.”
Remember that starting school can feel overwhelming for children. School is a very stimulating environment. Children are away from the safety zone of home, are mixing with new children in potentially larger classes, have a new teacher and will be doing different activities to those that they’ve done before.
Preparation is key. Mentally prepare young children for school routines by reducing the amount of new experiences they will have at once. Practise things before they start. Get them to put on their uniform and change into their PE kit. Try out the journey to school and talk about the route that you might take. Try to arrange playdates with some of the children who will be in their class so that they can begin to make friends or at least recognise some familiar faces.
Accept that settling in takes time. Whilst some children will take to school immediately, others will find it more challenging. Parents should recognise that their child’s behaviour might be different or challenging at home, and this is ok! They are likely to be tired, and may well be grumpy and hungry when they return home after a long day at school. Be patient.
Be aware of your own anxieties and emotions. Parental emotions and worries can negatively impact on children’s feelings. It’s best to be mindful of how we talk about the move to school and how things that we say might impact positively or negatively on our children.
Don’t make assumptions. Dr Dempsey was recently involved in a study which asked young children how they felt about school. They then asked those children’s parents the same question. For the first year of children’s schooling, the views of parents and children didn’t align, and parents were largely unaware of children’s real feelings. The study found that children often report negatives from their day (falling over in the playground, for example), rather than the great time that they had in the sand area.
Don’t bombard children with questions as soon as they get home. Remember that different children need different things. Some will need to run around in the park. Others will need to chill out. Daily routines might need adapting. Attune to their needs.
Ensure that you have your own sources of support. When children start school, life changes for parents too. Sources of social support might change. Some families may find themselves without the levels of help that they really need and they may feel more stressed or irritable. To help maintain harmony at home, try to maintain your own interests and relationships. Remember that you are important too!
Tooled Up members can access a huge range of resources designed to support school transition for different ages and stages. Check them out here.

Dr Caoimhe Dempsey
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Economic and Social Research Institute
Dr Caoimhe Dempsey is a postdoctoral researcher in Education at the Economic and Social Research Institute in Ireland. Her research examines child, family and school factors that influence children's adjustment and school experiences. Dr Dempsey's work bridges the fields of developmental and educational psychology and aims to provide tangible policy and practice implications. She holds a PhD and MRes in Developmental Psychology from the University of Cambridge and a Ba in Psychology from Trinity College Dublin. She has recently co-authored a book with Professor Claire Hughes and Dr Elian Fink called The Psychology of Starting School: An Evidence-Based Guide for Parents and Teachers.
Dr Caoimhe Dempsey
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Economic and Social Research Institute
Related Resources

20 Books About Starting School
Scroll our research gallery

Aug 13, 2025
Students’ views on smartphone bans
In recent years, banning or restricting children’s access to smartphones and social media has grasped the attention of policy makers, schools and parents. A number of countries, including France, Turkey, Norway, Sweden, and regions of the US and Canada have introduced laws, policies or guidance for schools to ‘ban’ or heavily restrict the use of phones. Within Ireland, in 2024, the Minister for Education announced her intention to introduce smartphone bans in post-primary schools, whilst at the same time acknowledging that individual schools are best placed to decide on the scope and scale of restrictions for their students. Whilst these bans aim to protect children from harm, and teachers often anecdotally report seeing benefits, evaluations of existing research highlight a lack of evidence on their efficacy. At the moment, we simply don't know enough about the impact of bans. Evidence is hampered by the fact that technological developments and technology use is moving at a faster pace than research. Some studies suggest that bans are beneficial to academic outcomes and mental wellbeing. Others suggest no effects. However, many studies have methodological weaknesses, use small samples or retrospective data, and can't ascribe causal mechanisms. Our latest Researcher of the Month, Dr Megan Reynolds, has recently published a paper which explores young people's perspectives and experiences of smartphone bans in their schools. Unlike most previous research, it centres student voices in this high profile issue.

Jul 14, 2025
Do teens with mental health conditions use social media differently than their peers?
As Luisa Fassi, our new Researcher of the Month, comments, "The link between social media use and youth mental health is hotly debated, but hardly any studies look at young people already struggling with clinical-level mental health symptoms". In fact, Luisa's large systematic review and meta-analysis found that only 11% of papers published on the topic since 2007 focused on young people with clinical conditions. Her review also showed that the data used to evidence mental health conditions in these existing studies is not always strong or especially robust. Many report links between social media and mental health on the basis of short self-report questionnaires, where young people are asked about symptoms. Whilst this wasn't found as part of Luisa's review, it is also the case that very few papers in the field differentiate between different mental health conditions, or examine different symptoms or conditions (such as anxiety, ADHD or eating disorders) in isolation. To address this research gap, Luisa and colleagues have recently published a fascinating and nuanced paper. It analyses both quantitative and qualitative dimensions of social media use from a nationally representative survey of 3,340 teens in the UK aged between 11 and 19 years old, which was conducted by NHS Digital in 2017. Rather than gathering mental health data from self-report questionnaires, the young people in the survey underwent a full clinical screening, which included interviews with the young people, their parents and teachers. Information about social media use came from questionnaires completed by participants. They were not asked about specific platforms. Luisa used this data to gather novel insights into how social media and mental health are related in teens who both meet and do not meet diagnostic criteria for a wide range of mental health conditions. The study does not establish any causal links, but it does reveals a range of differences between young people with and without mental health conditions when it comes to social media.

Jun 17, 2025
Navigating the feed: younger adolescents' reflections on algorithmically curated social media
Our latest researcher of the month, Roxana Pomplun, has investigated the interactions, experiences and perceptions of younger adolescents, aged 11, 12, and 13, with algorithmically curated platforms such as TikTok, YouTube Shorts, Spotlight on Snapchat and Reels on Instagram. These kinds of platforms use algorithms to personalise and tailor feeds, harnessing user data to suggest content that the individual is most likely to be interested in and engage with. As such, young people have little control over what they are seeing in their feeds. Tech companies are not yet required to be transparent about the data that they are collecting, but it tends to include demographic information such as age, gender or location, along with use patterns. Whilst these sites dominate the digital lives of tweens and teens, until now they have received little dedicated research attention, particularly in relation to younger users, with most existing studies focusing on older teens. Whilst we know that most social media platforms have age limits of 13, we also know that many younger children are active users, particularly of algorithmically curated platforms like TikTok and YouTube Shorts. Given that early adolescence is a life phase marked by critical neurological development, identity development and heightened susceptibility to mental health issues, deepening our understanding of how younger adolescents engage with social media is vital. Roxana's qualitative research, where a group of young people eloquently explore their own experiences and perceptions, broadens our knowledge of social media use within an age group that appears increasingly aware of the digital influences shaping their online experiences, yet which is still in need of support to fully navigate these ecosystems.

May 15, 2025
Looking beyond smartphone bans
Over the last year or so, there has been a surge in public concern around smartphones and social media. Banning or restricting children’s access to smartphones and social media has grasped the attention of policy makers, schools and parents. A number of countries, including France, Turkey, Norway, Sweden, and regions of the US and Canada have introduced laws, policies or guidance for schools to ‘ban’ or heavily restrict the use of phones. In the UK, there are proposals to raise the age of ‘internet adulthood’ from 13 to 16, and to ban smartphones in schools. The third reading of a private members’ bill on this topic will be heard in parliament in July. Whilst these bans aim to protect children from harm, recent studies highlight a lack of evidence on their efficacy. Along with a team of international experts, our latest Researcher of the Month, Professor Victoria Goodyear, argues that, in isolation, banning smartphone and social media access fails to equip children for healthy use of technology. She suggests that there is a need to shift debates, policies and practices away from a sole focus on restricting smartphone and social media access, toward an emphasis on nurturing children’s digital skills for healthy technology use, and a rights-respecting approach which is underpinned by age-appropriate design and education.

Apr 22, 2025
Encouraging adventurous play in the preschool years
Tune into our podcast interview with April's researchers of the month here. As well as providing numerous opportunities for exploration, joy, and expression, outdoor and adventurous play - the type of play that allows children to take age-appropriate risks - is associated with a range of positive health behaviours and outcomes. Yes, we're talking about the kind of play that might leave us adults with our hearts in our mouths at times, as children start to disappear up a tree, or engage in a rough and tumble game of chase. But its benefits are wide-ranging and known impacts include increased levels of habitual physical activity alongside better mental health and positive mood. In 2019, Dr Hesketh was involved in the creation of physical activity guidelines in the UK, which explicitly note the importance of outdoor play for children in the preschool age group. We know quite a lot about the play habits of school-aged children, but until now, have had significantly less data on their younger counterparts. Our Researchers of the Month, Dr Kathryn Hesketh and Professor Helen Dodd set out to discover how much time preschool-aged children spend playing in a range of indoor and outdoor spaces, and how adventurously they are playing within them. In the first national survey of play in children of this age, they asked over 1000 parents of two to four year olds about their children’s play habits, finding that, on average, children aged two to four spend around four hours per day (outside of educational settings) playing. Just under 50% of this was spent playing outdoors. Their findings shed interesting light on some inequalities in play, even in the youngest age group, which may exacerbate existing inequalities in health.

Mar 17, 2025
Fostering a school culture against bullying: the KiVa Programme
Bullying is an extremely important public mental health risk. Around one in five primary school children report being bullied at least weekly. Children who are bullied are more likely to experience depression and anxiety, and are at heightened risk of mental health issues in adolescence and adulthood. Whilst schools in England and Wales are required to have anti-bullying policies, rates of bullying remain high. Bullying is preventable, but schools need more help to tackle it. Typically, school policies focus on how to handle bullying once it happens. However, evidence suggests that a comprehensive approach involving the entire school to prevent bullying, alongside clear strategies for addressing confirmed cases, is the most effective way to tackle the issue. KiVa is one such whole-school approach, developed in Finland by Professor Christina Samivalli. A large study in Finland which involved 28,000 primary school pupils found that adopting the KiVa programme in Finnish schools significantly reduced bullying and improved children's mental wellbeing. The programme has since been rolled out nationally by the Finnish government and ongoing use of KiVa in Finnish schools is associated with year-on-year incremental reductions in bullying. Along with colleagues, our researcher of the month, Professor Judy Hutchings OBE, has tested the effectiveness of the KiVa Programme in UK primary schools. The study involved over 11,000 children in Wales, Birmingham, Oxfordshire and Devon, and showed a 13% reduction in reported rates of bullying when compared with existing school approaches to tackle bullying.

Feb 12, 2025
When is the right age? Searching for age-appropriate ways to support children's online lives
Currently, children's and young people’s use of digital technology is rarely out of the news. Age limits are debated. Calls for stronger limits are made, and questions are raised regarding whether society should ban 'under-age' children from various aspects of the digital world. 13 years of age is often cited as a digital 'age of consent', though this varies in some countries. Commonly used age limits are largely arbitrary, based primarily on US legislation, rather than evidence. In a recent paper, our researcher of the month, Dr Kim Sylwander, and her co-author Professor Sonia Livingstone, consider age milestones and evaluate whether or not the evidence supports them. Are age limits the optimal way to regulate children’s digital experiences? Does it matter that they are widely contested and often poorly implemented? And are common boundaries even the “right” age, according to evidence from the field of children and digital media? Dr Sylwander persuasively argues that moving forward, a developmental approach can better support children’s rights.

Jan 14, 2025
Showing faith and trust in children nurtures integrity
A new study which explores the development of trust and integrity in children has found that expressing trust in young children encourages them to behave honesty. The research team, including our researcher of the month, Professor Li Zhao, studied whether children were less likely to cheat in a simple test of counting accuracy if the adult administering the test had previously conveyed trust in them. They found that children who were trusted cheated less than those who were not trusted. These findings provide novel evidence about the causal effect of trust on the development of children's honesty.

Dec 17, 2024
Intrinsic reward and word learning
From infancy onwards, humans display an innate motivation to acquire language and to communicate. We start acquiring words as babies and continue to do so throughout our lives. In fact, children are thought to learn over 3000 new words each year. However, relatively little work has focused on why we are motivated to learn words, particularly when it comes to adolescents. Adolescence is a period of great neurological change and sensitivity to learning. It's also marked by changes in reading behaviours. Whilst children become skilled readers between the ages of 10 and 18, this period is also associated with motivational changes in reading, with teens frequently showing a disinclination to read for pleasure. This change often coincides with the transition from primary to secondary school. Policy makers are keen to motivate adolescents to read for pleasure, arguing that it would improve not just literacy outcomes, but also result in substantial economic and societal benefit. Recent research has shown that adults find learning words to be intrinsically rewarding, and that this intrinsic reward facilitates the entrance of new words into long-term memory. In their latest paper, our researchers of the month, Professor Saloni Krishnan and Professor Pablo Ripollés, set out to establish whether the same is true for children and teens.

Nov 14, 2024
Delivering effective menstrual education
Research has shown that menstruation and menstrual cycle symptoms can be disruptive and detrimental to physical, mental and social wellbeing. As many as 93% of teen girls experience dysmenorrhea (severe cramps) and girls with a typical cycle experience 11 menstrual cycle-related symptoms on average, potentially including mood changes, stomach cramps and increased levels of anxiety and fatigue. Adolescents with problematic symptoms have reported a negative impact on school attendance, behaviour, confidence around peers and participation in physical activity. In the United Kingdom, evidence suggests that menstrual health education delivered by teachers generally focuses on menstrual cycle biology, as opposed to management of menstruation and menstrual cycle related symptoms. Our latest researcher of the month, Dr Natalie Brown, set out to understand young people’s perceptions of menstrual education in schools and their experiences of menstruating whilst at school, including within physical education. Her study involved nine focus groups with 10-15 year old female pupils attending primary and secondary schools across England and Wales. Pupils highlighted that, in their experience, menstrual education is limited and noted that the menstrual cycle impacts negatively on their school experience, affecting participation in sport and school attendance generally. Participants highlighted a need for more support and information regarding understanding and managing periods in school.