Researcher of the Month

June 16, 2026

Making feedback more motivating: lessons from new research

Making feedback more motivating: lessons from new research

We often assume that positive feedback will always encourage people to keep trying hard. However, new research by our latest Researcher of the Month, Professor Nils Jostmann, and his co-author Professor Eddie Brummelman, suggests that praise and encouragement can sometimes have the opposite effect, and that how and when we give feedback really matters.

Feeling positive about our progress on a task, or believing that we are doing better than we expected to, can sometimes act as a cue that less effort is needed, causing us to work less hard or 'coast'. Positive feedback may therefore have unintended consequences. Rather than spurring us on, it can sometimes encourage us to ease off because we feel confident that we are already doing well enough. Professor Jostmann's recent research sought to explore this further, examining whether the timing of positive feedback influences whether it boosts motivation or inadvertently undermines performance.

Summary

The study invited a group of adults to participate in a series of experiments involving the completion of repeated, simple, on screen calculation tasks. These were motivationally taxing but not cognitively challenging, so they did not create anxiety or stress.

The participants were split into two groups. Some received immediate positive feedback on the screen after completing a task, such as ‘Good job’. They were told that this meant they had done particularly well, or outperformed others in the group. Others received no immediate feedback. This absence of feedback was designed to be uninformative. Participants were told that not receiving feedback simply meant that the researchers had chosen not to provide any; it didn't necessarily mean they had performed poorly. The participants who did not receive feedback performed better in the tasks, in terms of both speed and accuracy.

Before each new task began, participants were shown a brief announcement indicating that the next task was about to start. Although such prompts are normally ignored, the researchers subtly altered them in ways that captured participants' attention and encouraged them to prepare mentally for the upcoming task.

For the participants receiving feedback, some were given comments before seeing this message and others after. When feedback was delivered immediately after completing the task, before the new task was announced, positive feedback led to coasting. However, when the same positive feedback was delivered after the announcement message, by which point participants had already entered a state of readiness for the next task, the coasting effect disappeared and performance actually improved.

The researchers found that feedback timing matters. Once participants had started thinking about or preparing for their next task, positive feedback acted as a boost to motivation rather than a signal that they could relax and coast. These findings were robust and consistent and weren't impacted by personality factors or situational differences.

The study suggests that positive feedback can be a powerful motivator, but it may be most helpful when it encourages people towards their next challenge rather than rewarding them immediately after the last one. Whilst the study has not yet been replicated in children, it may indicate that praise is most effective when children are already engaged in, or preparing for, their next task. Telling a child, "You did brilliantly on that piece of work" just before they switch off may have a different and less motivational effect than offering the same praise once they are focused on the next challenge.

For parents and educators, an awareness of when and how to give feedback is likely to make it more effective.

Implications

Tips for parents and educators

Remember that it's not only about motivation. Feedback and praise can communicate multiple things and children and teens are very sensitive to it. It can tell young people how they are viewed by significant adults, reinforce feelings of competence and provide information about the quality of a relationship. It can help children understand what they have done well, build their confidence and sense of belonging and strengthen connections with parents, teachers and other trusted adults. It's not only for the purpose of motivation and we should continue to offer positive feedback and praise with these numerous factors in mind.

Be clear about the goal of your feedback. Whilst positive feedback can serve many functions, it may not achieve them all at once. Before praising a child, consider what you are hoping to achieve. Are you trying to build their confidence? Celebrate an achievement? Strengthen your relationship? Or are you hoping to motivate them to keep working towards a particular goal? Being clear about your purpose can help you use feedback more effectively.

Focus on the controllables. Did you know that feedback which targets children's personalities, such as, “You’re very good” or, “You’re so intelligent” can actually have detrimental effects. It is more beneficial to provide positive feedback on things that children can control, including effort and persistence.

Link praise to the next step. If your aim is to sustain motivation, positive feedback may be most motivating when children have already started thinking about what comes next. If a child or teen has done well on a test, project or piece of work, help them to reflect on next steps before celebrating their success. We might encourage a moment of reflection and then connect praise to future goals. What would you like to achieve next? What are your priorities or plan moving forward? Once children have considered their next steps, positive feedback can reinforce their confidence and help fuel future effort.

Consider what your praise is communicating. When we are just beginning a new activity, we are often less concerned with progress and more concerned with questions such as: Am I good at this? Do I enjoy it? Is this worth pursuing? Feedback that builds confidence and enjoyment at the start of a task may be particularly valuable for children. Later, when they have become more competent, it may be helpful to combine praise with conversations about future goals, next steps and continued growth.

Unexpected praise may have a stronger impact. Professor Jostmann suggests that the effects of positive feedback may depend partly on how surprising it is. According to the theory underlying coasting, people constantly make predictions about how well they are doing. Positive feedback has the greatest impact when it tells us something new; namely, that we are performing better than we expected. This means that praise which is highly predictable may have less influence. If a child is accustomed to receiving enthusiastic encouragement from a parent, those positive comments may become expected and less informative. By contrast, praise from someone who rarely gives compliments, or from a person whose opinion carries particular weight, may come as more of a surprise and have a stronger effect. Feedback that exceeds their expectations may be more likely to influence how they think and feel about their achievements and may sometimes have a greater effect on their subsequent effort.

Try to make learning relevant to real life. Since coasting is more common when children don’t feel a sense of intrinsic interest or motivation to learn, anything that we can do to explain the relevance of learning content is key. In a recent, as yet unpublished, study, Professor Jostmann and his colleagues found that students who felt their maths teacher successfully explained why the subject matter was relevant tended to achieve higher grades. While the findings are correlational and do not prove cause and effect, they suggest that helping students see the value and purpose of their learning may play a role in supporting engagement and academic success.

Finally, remember that coasting is not always a bad thing. Balance is important. We don’t need to optimise our effort at all times. Children and young people have multiple goals competing for their time and energy, including learning, friendships, family life, hobbies and rest. Coasting can give us space to prioritise and balance competing goals, and allow time for relaxation and rest, which is also vital.

Tune into our interview with Professor Jostmann here.

Professor Nils Jostmann

Professor Nils Jostmann

Assistant Professor of Social Psychology, University of Amsterdam

    Scroll our research gallery

    Reframing Masculinity: Tips for Parents and Teachers Supporting Boys

    May 22, 2026

    Reframing Masculinity: Tips for Parents and Teachers Supporting Boys

    Dr King-Hill's research with young people has found that many many boys and young men today are grappling with how masculinity is defined and expressed, and many are struggling. In response, she has recently published We're In This Together, Reframing Masculinity for Young Boys and Men. This free, practical and accessible resource is designed for educators and parents or carers, and is packed with thoughtful guidance and realistic strategies to help the boys and young men growing up in our care to thrive. We'd recommend that all of our Tooled Up parents and educators download and read it.

    Empowering young people to overcome low mood and boost wellbeing

    Apr 14, 2026

    Empowering young people to overcome low mood and boost wellbeing

    Our latest researcher of the month, Professor Maria Loades, is currently seeking teens aged 13 - 17 to take part in a new study. Her Unlock Wellbeing trial will test the efficacy of digital, single session, self-help interventions, which have been designed to help young people in need of mental health support to feel more hopeful, more in control, and less sad or low. In the UK, there is currently a huge gap between the need for mental health support and access to help for young people. We know from a wide body of research that many young people feel unable to ask for help when experiencing depression symptoms. Whilst around 3% of young people are in contact with Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) at any point in time, this is only a very small percentage of those impacted by depression, anxiety or stress. In fact, at least one in three young people has at least some symptoms of depression, and one in 10 might meet the criteria for a mental health disorder. There are several reasons why many young people do not seek, or receive, the support they need. Adolescence is a time of growing independence, and many teens prefer to manage difficulties on their own, speak to friends or look online, rather than reach out to adults for help. Although stigma has reduced, concerns about how others might perceive them, and uncertainty about what support is available, can also hold them back. Practical barriers also play a role. School and clinic hours often overlap, and services are not always easily accessible. Alongside this, there is a shortage of trained therapists in the UK, leading to high thresholds for support and long waiting times, even for those who do seek help. Even more interestingly, of those young people who do seek formal support, almost 50% stop attending after just one session. Whilst one session may be sufficient for some, other young people may disengage due to practical challenges, or because the first session did not meet their expectations, even when further support was available. Given the shortcomings of the current model of support, research  by Professor Loades and her team has identified a need for additional help that is scalable, barrier free and available on demand. After pilot tests, she's now planning a full randomised controlled trial to evaluate a series of self-guided, digital, single-session interventions for teens, and she's looking for volunteers. The interventions were originally developed by Professor Jessica Schleider in the Lab for Scalable Mental Health in the US, where they showed beneficial effects on symptoms of depression and anxiety as much as nine months after the intervention. They have been adapted by Professor Loades and colleagues for UK use.

    The Universal Classroom: A New Free Screening Tool for Year 1 Teachers

    Mar 12, 2026

    The Universal Classroom: A New Free Screening Tool for Year 1 Teachers

    Our latest Researcher of the Month, Professor Joel Talcott, is one of a team of researchers and educators who have worked on a new universal screener for all Year 1 children in the UK, which will be made freely available to all teachers this Autumn. Within the UK education system, formal identification of SEND typically involves ascribing diagnostic labels, such as dyslexia, dyscalculia or ADHD, based on under-attainment in one or more educational outcomes, compared with age-related expectations. However, access to assessment and diagnosis is challenging, and it is currently not equitable for all. The cost of missing children’s needs has serious personal consequences, as pupils underachieve due to unidentified barriers to learning. It also has wider and significant economic costs to society as a whole. Professor Talcott's new universal screener will address this issue. It offers a simple screening tool, which teachers are initially advised to use with all pupils during the first term of Year 1. Supported by government funding through a special educational needs innovation initiative, the Universal Classroom will be delivered via a freely accessible web platform, allowing any school or teacher to use it at no cost.

    Children's Experiences of ADHD

    Feb 17, 2026

    Children's Experiences of ADHD

    While there have been many empirical studies of childhood ADHD, there have been few qualitative studies investigating first-hand accounts of the lived experiences of children. Much of the literature focuses on the perspectives of parents or teachers, rather than centring children’s voices. But what are children's thoughts, feelings and experiences? Our latest Researcher of the Month, PhD candidate Daphne Ling, has recently published findings which begin to address this research gap.

    The power of reading: books, vocabulary and learning

    Jan 19, 2026

    The power of reading: books, vocabulary and learning

    Did you know that 2026 is the UK’s National Year of Reading? This long-overdue initiative reflects growing concern and renewed commitment around children’s reading and literacy. As Dr Maria Korochkina, our latest Researcher of the Month, puts it: “The ability to read opens up worlds. Reading enables children to progress into post-primary education and provides the basis for lifelong learning and prosperity into adulthood”. Frequent readers tend to have a stronger understanding of both their own and others’ emotions. They are often better able to communicate these emotions, a skill linked to higher emotional intelligence and improved mental wellbeing. Reading also encourages cause-and-effect reasoning and helps children imagine scenarios beyond the immediate moment - developing the skill of -future-thinking'. A rich vocabulary underpins learning across the school curriculum, strengthens thinking and communication skills, and predicts both academic attainment and later life outcomes. Research consistently shows that the most effective way to build vocabulary is through reading. However, learning to read well is not quick or effortless. The journey to skilled reading typically spans around ten years, requiring high-quality classroom instruction alongside sustained practice through independent reading. For many children, this process is painstaking, demanding consistent teaching, encouragement and opportunity over time. Against this backdrop, recent evidence presents a worrying picture. Fewer children are reading for pleasure than ever before. In 2024, only one in three UK children and young people aged eight to 18 reported enjoying reading in their free time. Even more strikingly, just one in five said they read daily for pleasure, the lowest level recorded since the National Literacy Trust began collecting this data in 2005. This matters because reading ability and reading enjoyment are deeply intertwined. Children who find reading effortful are far less likely to choose to read independently. Dr Korochkina’s research highlights how early reading experiences shape later habits: difficulties with phonic and morphological knowledge in the early stages of reading acquisition can have a snowball effect, reducing confidence, fluency and motivation over time. Her work also offers a powerful note of optimism. Books that children actively choose to read, including contemporary, popular texts, provide rich opportunities to develop vocabulary, particularly when children read widely. Ensuring access to a diverse range of engaging reading material, alongside strong early instruction, can play a vital role in building both reading skill and reading motivation. Fostering confident, motivated readers requires long-term commitment. It is not enough for children simply to have books available to them. They need skilled teaching, time, practice and a culture that values reading as both a skill and a pleasure.

    Crossing the line into cybercrime

    Dec 15, 2025

    Crossing the line into cybercrime

    As the most digitally connected generation so far, young people today face new challenges. Our latest Researchers of the Month, Professor Davidson and Dr Farr, have found that in the last decade, an increasing number of young people (particularly young men) have committed serious cybercrime offences, particularly hacking and money laundering. Their new book, written following a large research project funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, seeks to understand the drivers behind this trend. It explores a range of potential factors that may lead young people to engage in risky online behaviours, and to identify effective pathways for prevention.

    Supporting Children’s Use of AI

    Nov 16, 2025

    Supporting Children’s Use of AI

    Children and young people are now growing up surrounded by AI, and the landscape is shifting fast. In the UK, recent data from Ofcom and Internet Matters suggests that around half of children aged 8–17 regularly use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, Bard or Snapchat’s MyAI. Many describe these interactions as feeling like conversations with a friend. A recent report from Common Sense Media found that 33% of teens had actually chosen to talk to an AI companion instead of a real person about something important or serious. Whether children are asking voice assistants to answer their questions, relying on chatbots for bedtime stories, using learning apps for revision or engaging with large generative AI models, it’s essential to remember that most of these systems were built with adults in mind, not children. They often assume levels of attention, memory and emotional maturity that younger users simply don’t have. Even older children and teenagers, who increasingly use AI as a supportive confidante (often without adult supervision or knowledge), are still learning to navigate boundaries around trust, identity and emotion. Our latest Researcher of the Month, Dr Nomisha Kurian, wants this to change. She has developed a new framework called Developmentally Aligned Design (DAD), which outlines how AI can be built with children’s needs, vulnerabilities and strengths at its core. She also chatted to us at Tooled Up, sharing practical tips on recognising when children may be relying too heavily on AI for emotional connection, how to talk to them about healthy boundaries, and how parents and educators can help children and young people use AI tools safely, creatively and critically.

    Algorithmised Girlhood: Teenage Girls and TikTok

    Oct 16, 2025

    Algorithmised Girlhood: Teenage Girls and TikTok

    As part of the early stages of her PhD study, our latest researcher of the month, Chiara Fehr, ran several focus groups about experiences of TikTok with eight 17 year old girls. Using creative methods, such as ‘TikTok show and tells’ a collaging session and a utopic mapping exercise, Chiara is exploring whether dominant narratives around growing up in a digitised world reflect the real life experiences of teens, and has summarised her findings so far in a recent article.

    “[They use devices] alllllllll day long”. What do children think about our tech use?

    Sep 09, 2025

    “[They use devices] alllllllll day long”. What do children think about our tech use?

    We're all used to reading about children and young people's increasing use of digital tech. But what about adults' use? And what impact might our tech use have on family life? Parents today are spending an unprecedented amount of time on their devices. One study found that parents spend an average of nine hours per day engaged with screen devices. Over four hours of this is on smartphones, averaging 67 phone checks per day. Despite children's central role in family life, their voices and perspectives on the device use of the adults around them have been largely neglected in research. Along with colleagues, our latest Researcher of the Month, Professor Cara Swit, has published a fascinating study exploring the experiences and perceptions of children aged six to nine about their parents’ device use at home and its impact on them.

    Students’ views on smartphone bans

    Aug 13, 2025

    Students’ views on smartphone bans

    In recent years, banning or restricting children’s access to smartphones and social media has grasped the attention of policy makers, schools and parents. A number of countries, including France, Turkey, Norway, Sweden, and regions of the US and Canada have introduced laws, policies or guidance for schools to ‘ban’ or heavily restrict the use of phones. Within Ireland, in 2024, the Minister for Education announced her intention to introduce smartphone bans in post-primary schools, whilst at the same time acknowledging that individual schools are best placed to decide on the scope and scale of restrictions for their students. Whilst these bans aim to protect children from harm, and teachers often anecdotally report seeing benefits, evaluations of existing research highlight a lack of evidence on their efficacy. At the moment, we simply don't know enough about the impact of bans. Evidence is hampered by the fact that technological developments and technology use is moving at a faster pace than research. Some studies suggest that bans are beneficial to academic outcomes and mental wellbeing. Others suggest no effects. However, many studies have methodological weaknesses, use small samples or retrospective data, and can't ascribe causal mechanisms. Our latest Researcher of the Month, Dr Megan Reynolds, has recently published a paper which explores young people's perspectives and experiences of smartphone bans in their schools. Unlike most previous research, it centres student voices in this high profile issue.

    Schools and businesses

    Let's get started

    Get in touch