Researcher of the Month

July 14, 2026

What Does Effective Drugs Education Look Like? Lessons from The Illicit Project UK

What Does Effective Drugs Education Look Like? Lessons from The Illicit Project UK

Our latest Researcher of the Month, Professor Harry Sumnall, is leading a team of researchers at Liverpool John Moores University to adapt and test a school drug prevention programme aimed at older teens (aged 15-18). The Illicit Project UK aims to develop teens' skills so that they can make healthier and safer choices when it comes to drug use, avoiding fear mongering approaches of the past that were designed to scare young people, and which we now know to be ineffective. The programme is fully aligned with the national RSHE curriculum in England and with the health and wellbeing curriculum in Scotland.

This evidence-based approach is currently being tested in the North West of England and Scotland. The researchers are still looking for more schools, so if you work in a setting based in these areas and would like to be involved in the trial, please contact us and we'll put you in touch with the research team. You can find out more about what participation involves here.

Summary

This project forms part of a UK government initiative aiming to prevent and reduce drug use and dependency, a historically underfunded area. General rates of substance use have been in sharp decline over the last 20 years, in both the UK and other high income countries globally. The most recent biannual NHS Digital survey, which invites responses from children and young people aged 11-15, found that 15% of 11-15 year olds have taken drugs in their life. As recently as 2018, this figure was 24%. In terms of illegal drugs, most of this decline relates to use of cannabis and nitrous oxide. The amount of young people vaping increased sharply over the last decade, but this too now seems to have plateaued.

Despite these encouraging trends, substance use continues to present significant challenges for public health and communities. Drug and alcohol related deaths remain a leading cause of preventable mortality among adults of working age, and the illicit drugs market continues to contribute to crime and violence. For those young people who do use illegal drugs, the risks may now also be greater than in the past because the composition and potency of substances available on the illicit market has become increasingly unpredictable, including the emergence of highly potent synthetic opioids.

How can The Illicit Project UK help?

The Illicit programme was originally designed in Australia, where trials found that it reduced the use of cocaine, ecstasy and vapes, and had a mixed impact on cannabis consumption. The UK team has worked closely with researchers from the University of Sydney and, along with young people's input, the content has been adapted for the UK's cultural and legal context. It consists of three 35-minute classroom sessions, delivered online as self-directed learning modules and requires minimal teacher involvement (with the exception of a short group debrief at the completion of each of the three sections).

Across the three modules, students explore how the adolescent brain develops, why this influences decision-making, reward, impulse control and risk-taking, and what happens when alcohol or other drugs are introduced into this developing system. Alongside the science, the programme helps young people apply their learning to realistic situations by using contributions from young adults to consider potential real-world contexts in which substance use might occur. This includes a focus on peer influence, parties, festivals, mental health and social pressures. It also encourages students to recognise when a friend may be struggling and understand the importance of seeking support from trusted adults. This combination of neuroscience, psychology and practical decision-making skills has been found to help young people develop the knowledge and confidence to make safer choices, and is designed to complement a school's wider approach to RSHE, safeguarding and drugs education.

So far, feedback from both students and teachers has been encouraging. Young people reported enjoying the evidence-based approach and the programme's focus on neuroscience, saying they learned more than they had from traditional assemblies or more didactic classroom lessons. They particularly valued hearing from slightly older peers, whose reflections focused not on drug or alcohol use itself, but on growing up, navigating social pressures and maintaining their wellbeing.

One of the biggest design challenges was balancing what young people said they wanted with what the evidence suggests is most effective. Many students expressed a preference for short, TikTok-style content, but evidence shows that meaningful behaviour change cannot be achieved through brief, attention-grabbing videos alone. Developing knowledge, decision-making skills and lasting behaviour change takes time, which is why The Illicit Project uses longer, interactive modules that encourage discussion, reflection and skill development.

Teachers have also welcomed the programme's strong evidence base and close alignment with national guidance. Whilst some schools found it challenging to fit the 35-minute modules into timetables where RSHE is often delivered in much shorter sessions, many recognised that the additional time reflected the programme's evidence-informed design rather than unnecessary content.

Implications

Tips for educators

Beyond focusing specifically on The Illicit Project, think carefully about what drugs education you offer your students. One off assemblies, fear-based shock talks, ex user testimonies and zero-tolerance or exclusionary approaches are all shown to be ineffective approaches in research evidence. Exclusion as a result of substance use, in particular, dramatically increases the risk of escalation.

Choose external providers carefully. Schools are often approached by organisations offering talks or workshops on drugs and alcohol. Whilst many are well intentioned, not all programmes are evidence-based. Before inviting an external speaker into school, ask about their professional background, the evidence underpinning their approach and whether they can explain what is known to be effective in prevention education. It is also worth asking whether they work with local education, public health or safeguarding teams, and seeking feedback from other schools that have used their programme.

Look for programmes that go beyond facts and fear. Effective prevention education recognises the wider factors that influence young people's decisions, including mental health, relationships, peer influence, safety and wellbeing. Be cautious of programmes that rely heavily on fear-based messages or dramatic anecdotes, as these are not supported by the evidence.

Be cautious about relying on one-off interventions. One-off assemblies, awareness days and drop-in sessions may have a role in signposting young people towards support, but the evidence suggests they are unlikely to produce lasting changes in behaviour or decision-making. Effective prevention is most likely when learning is embedded within a planned, evidence-informed curriculum delivered over time.

Think carefully before using lived experience testimonies. Whilst former substance users often have powerful and compelling stories to tell, research suggests that these testimonies are unlikely to reduce substance use and, in some circumstances, may have unintended negative consequences. Because these speakers have ultimately survived and recovered, some young people may perceive their stories as exciting or even aspirational. In addition, such accounts often focus on extreme outcomes, such as addiction or overdose, which are not representative of the experiences most young people are likely to encounter. As a result, students may struggle to see the relevance to their own lives and dismiss the wider educational message.

Focus on risks that feel relevant. Rather than concentrating solely on the most severe consequences, prevention education should also help young people understand the more common and immediate risks associated with substance use, such as accidents, arguments, impaired judgement, unsafe situations, relationship difficulties or getting into trouble with the police. These are often more personally relevant and can help young people consider how to make informed decisions .

Make contact with your local authority. It’s important for schools to know about local drugs services. Professor Sumnall advises reaching out to local authorities or public health teams to find out what they can offer. Many local drugs service providers do great work in schools, delivering sessions or working with specific groups of children, or staff to help develop appropriate and supportive policies.

Keep your eyes peeled for The Illicit Project UK to be launched more widely.

Tips for parents

Consider what you are modelling. We can all think about our own relationship with substances (including alcohol, vapes or tobacco). How accessible is alcohol in your family home? What role does it play in family celebrations? How is it spoken about? Are there clear rules around its consumption?

Don't assume that introducing alcohol early is protective. Although it may seem like a safer way to teach responsible drinking, research suggests that early introduction may contribute to the normalisation of alcohol use. Instead, delay introduction where possible and focus on open conversations, clear expectations and positive role modelling. Whilst parents and carers of older teens may consider, for example, introducing a limited supply of alcohol for a party on the basis that this offers some element of observation and control, regular supply of alcohol should certainly be avoided. Find out more in our interview with Dr Melissa Oldham on teen drinking, or in our Quick Guide to Alcohol.

Remember that adolescence is not risk-free. Experimenting, testing boundaries and learning from mistakes are all part of healthy development. If your teenager makes a risky decision or experiments with alcohol or other substances, try not to panic. One episode does not determine their future. Instead, use it as an opportunity for calm conversation, reflection and support, helping them understand what happened and how they might make safer choices next time.

Recognise that the relationship between substance use and health and wellbeing is often complex. Some young people may use alcohol or other drugs to cope with stress, uncertainty or emerging mental health difficulties, whilst others may see substances as a way of switching from periods of pressure, such as studying, into relaxation or socialising. Recognising these different motivations helps move conversations beyond simply discussing the substances themselves, encouraging young people to reflect on why they might be tempted to use them and to explore healthier ways of meeting those same needs.

Listen calmly. It can be very difficult to hear that your child has made a risky choice, particularly if you're worried about their safety. Try to stay calm, listen without interrupting and keep the conversation open. Your first response can have a big impact on whether they feel able to come to you again in the future. Reflective questions might include: How did that make you feel? Did you feel in control? What might you do differently next time?

Remember that ruptures can be repaired. Even if an initial discussion doesn't go as well as you had hoped, don't assume the opportunity has been lost. Research consistently shows that relationships are strengthened through repair. If emotions run high, take some time to calm down and return to the conversation later. Positive outcomes are still possible after a difficult start.

Tune into our interview with Professor Sumnall here.

Professor Harry Sumnall

Professor Harry Sumnall

Professor in Substance Use in the School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University

    Scroll our research gallery

    Making feedback more motivating: lessons from new research

    Jun 16, 2026

    Making feedback more motivating: lessons from new research

    We often assume that positive feedback will always encourage people to keep trying hard. However, new research by our latest Researcher of the Month, Professor Nils Jostmann, and his co-author Professor Eddie Brummelman, suggests that praise and encouragement can sometimes have the opposite effect, and that how and when we give feedback really matters. Feeling positive about our progress on a task, or believing that we are doing better than we expected to, can sometimes act as a cue that less effort is needed, causing us to work less hard or 'coast'. Positive feedback may therefore have unintended consequences. Rather than spurring us on, it can sometimes encourage us to ease off because we feel confident that we are already doing well enough. Professor Jostmann's recent research sought to explore this further, examining whether the timing of positive feedback influences whether it boosts motivation or inadvertently undermines performance.

    Reframing Masculinity: Tips for Parents and Teachers Supporting Boys

    May 22, 2026

    Reframing Masculinity: Tips for Parents and Teachers Supporting Boys

    Dr King-Hill's research with young people has found that many many boys and young men today are grappling with how masculinity is defined and expressed, and many are struggling. In response, she has recently published We're In This Together, Reframing Masculinity for Young Boys and Men. This free, practical and accessible resource is designed for educators and parents or carers, and is packed with thoughtful guidance and realistic strategies to help the boys and young men growing up in our care to thrive. We'd recommend that all of our Tooled Up parents and educators download and read it.

    Empowering young people to overcome low mood and boost wellbeing

    Apr 14, 2026

    Empowering young people to overcome low mood and boost wellbeing

    Our latest researcher of the month, Professor Maria Loades, is currently seeking teens aged 13 - 17 to take part in a new study. Her Unlock Wellbeing trial will test the efficacy of digital, single session, self-help interventions, which have been designed to help young people in need of mental health support to feel more hopeful, more in control, and less sad or low. In the UK, there is currently a huge gap between the need for mental health support and access to help for young people. We know from a wide body of research that many young people feel unable to ask for help when experiencing depression symptoms. Whilst around 3% of young people are in contact with Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) at any point in time, this is only a very small percentage of those impacted by depression, anxiety or stress. In fact, at least one in three young people has at least some symptoms of depression, and one in 10 might meet the criteria for a mental health disorder. There are several reasons why many young people do not seek, or receive, the support they need. Adolescence is a time of growing independence, and many teens prefer to manage difficulties on their own, speak to friends or look online, rather than reach out to adults for help. Although stigma has reduced, concerns about how others might perceive them, and uncertainty about what support is available, can also hold them back. Practical barriers also play a role. School and clinic hours often overlap, and services are not always easily accessible. Alongside this, there is a shortage of trained therapists in the UK, leading to high thresholds for support and long waiting times, even for those who do seek help. Even more interestingly, of those young people who do seek formal support, almost 50% stop attending after just one session. Whilst one session may be sufficient for some, other young people may disengage due to practical challenges, or because the first session did not meet their expectations, even when further support was available. Given the shortcomings of the current model of support, research  by Professor Loades and her team has identified a need for additional help that is scalable, barrier free and available on demand. After pilot tests, she's now planning a full randomised controlled trial to evaluate a series of self-guided, digital, single-session interventions for teens, and she's looking for volunteers. The interventions were originally developed by Professor Jessica Schleider in the Lab for Scalable Mental Health in the US, where they showed beneficial effects on symptoms of depression and anxiety as much as nine months after the intervention. They have been adapted by Professor Loades and colleagues for UK use.

    The Universal Classroom: A New Free Screening Tool for Year 1 Teachers

    Mar 12, 2026

    The Universal Classroom: A New Free Screening Tool for Year 1 Teachers

    Our latest Researcher of the Month, Professor Joel Talcott, is one of a team of researchers and educators who have worked on a new universal screener for all Year 1 children in the UK, which will be made freely available to all teachers this Autumn. Within the UK education system, formal identification of SEND typically involves ascribing diagnostic labels, such as dyslexia, dyscalculia or ADHD, based on under-attainment in one or more educational outcomes, compared with age-related expectations. However, access to assessment and diagnosis is challenging, and it is currently not equitable for all. The cost of missing children’s needs has serious personal consequences, as pupils underachieve due to unidentified barriers to learning. It also has wider and significant economic costs to society as a whole. Professor Talcott's new universal screener will address this issue. It offers a simple screening tool, which teachers are initially advised to use with all pupils during the first term of Year 1. Supported by government funding through a special educational needs innovation initiative, the Universal Classroom will be delivered via a freely accessible web platform, allowing any school or teacher to use it at no cost.

    Children's Experiences of ADHD

    Feb 17, 2026

    Children's Experiences of ADHD

    While there have been many empirical studies of childhood ADHD, there have been few qualitative studies investigating first-hand accounts of the lived experiences of children. Much of the literature focuses on the perspectives of parents or teachers, rather than centring children’s voices. But what are children's thoughts, feelings and experiences? Our latest Researcher of the Month, PhD candidate Daphne Ling, has recently published findings which begin to address this research gap.

    The power of reading: books, vocabulary and learning

    Jan 19, 2026

    The power of reading: books, vocabulary and learning

    Did you know that 2026 is the UK’s National Year of Reading? This long-overdue initiative reflects growing concern and renewed commitment around children’s reading and literacy. As Dr Maria Korochkina, our latest Researcher of the Month, puts it: “The ability to read opens up worlds. Reading enables children to progress into post-primary education and provides the basis for lifelong learning and prosperity into adulthood”. Frequent readers tend to have a stronger understanding of both their own and others’ emotions. They are often better able to communicate these emotions, a skill linked to higher emotional intelligence and improved mental wellbeing. Reading also encourages cause-and-effect reasoning and helps children imagine scenarios beyond the immediate moment - developing the skill of -future-thinking'. A rich vocabulary underpins learning across the school curriculum, strengthens thinking and communication skills, and predicts both academic attainment and later life outcomes. Research consistently shows that the most effective way to build vocabulary is through reading. However, learning to read well is not quick or effortless. The journey to skilled reading typically spans around ten years, requiring high-quality classroom instruction alongside sustained practice through independent reading. For many children, this process is painstaking, demanding consistent teaching, encouragement and opportunity over time. Against this backdrop, recent evidence presents a worrying picture. Fewer children are reading for pleasure than ever before. In 2024, only one in three UK children and young people aged eight to 18 reported enjoying reading in their free time. Even more strikingly, just one in five said they read daily for pleasure, the lowest level recorded since the National Literacy Trust began collecting this data in 2005. This matters because reading ability and reading enjoyment are deeply intertwined. Children who find reading effortful are far less likely to choose to read independently. Dr Korochkina’s research highlights how early reading experiences shape later habits: difficulties with phonic and morphological knowledge in the early stages of reading acquisition can have a snowball effect, reducing confidence, fluency and motivation over time. Her work also offers a powerful note of optimism. Books that children actively choose to read, including contemporary, popular texts, provide rich opportunities to develop vocabulary, particularly when children read widely. Ensuring access to a diverse range of engaging reading material, alongside strong early instruction, can play a vital role in building both reading skill and reading motivation. Fostering confident, motivated readers requires long-term commitment. It is not enough for children simply to have books available to them. They need skilled teaching, time, practice and a culture that values reading as both a skill and a pleasure.

    Crossing the line into cybercrime

    Dec 15, 2025

    Crossing the line into cybercrime

    As the most digitally connected generation so far, young people today face new challenges. Our latest Researchers of the Month, Professor Davidson and Dr Farr, have found that in the last decade, an increasing number of young people (particularly young men) have committed serious cybercrime offences, particularly hacking and money laundering. Their new book, written following a large research project funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, seeks to understand the drivers behind this trend. It explores a range of potential factors that may lead young people to engage in risky online behaviours, and to identify effective pathways for prevention.

    Supporting Children’s Use of AI

    Nov 16, 2025

    Supporting Children’s Use of AI

    Children and young people are now growing up surrounded by AI, and the landscape is shifting fast. In the UK, recent data from Ofcom and Internet Matters suggests that around half of children aged 8–17 regularly use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, Bard or Snapchat’s MyAI. Many describe these interactions as feeling like conversations with a friend. A recent report from Common Sense Media found that 33% of teens had actually chosen to talk to an AI companion instead of a real person about something important or serious. Whether children are asking voice assistants to answer their questions, relying on chatbots for bedtime stories, using learning apps for revision or engaging with large generative AI models, it’s essential to remember that most of these systems were built with adults in mind, not children. They often assume levels of attention, memory and emotional maturity that younger users simply don’t have. Even older children and teenagers, who increasingly use AI as a supportive confidante (often without adult supervision or knowledge), are still learning to navigate boundaries around trust, identity and emotion. Our latest Researcher of the Month, Dr Nomisha Kurian, wants this to change. She has developed a new framework called Developmentally Aligned Design (DAD), which outlines how AI can be built with children’s needs, vulnerabilities and strengths at its core. She also chatted to us at Tooled Up, sharing practical tips on recognising when children may be relying too heavily on AI for emotional connection, how to talk to them about healthy boundaries, and how parents and educators can help children and young people use AI tools safely, creatively and critically.

    Algorithmised Girlhood: Teenage Girls and TikTok

    Oct 16, 2025

    Algorithmised Girlhood: Teenage Girls and TikTok

    As part of the early stages of her PhD study, our latest researcher of the month, Chiara Fehr, ran several focus groups about experiences of TikTok with eight 17 year old girls. Using creative methods, such as ‘TikTok show and tells’ a collaging session and a utopic mapping exercise, Chiara is exploring whether dominant narratives around growing up in a digitised world reflect the real life experiences of teens, and has summarised her findings so far in a recent article.

    “[They use devices] alllllllll day long”. What do children think about our tech use?

    Sep 09, 2025

    “[They use devices] alllllllll day long”. What do children think about our tech use?

    We're all used to reading about children and young people's increasing use of digital tech. But what about adults' use? And what impact might our tech use have on family life? Parents today are spending an unprecedented amount of time on their devices. One study found that parents spend an average of nine hours per day engaged with screen devices. Over four hours of this is on smartphones, averaging 67 phone checks per day. Despite children's central role in family life, their voices and perspectives on the device use of the adults around them have been largely neglected in research. Along with colleagues, our latest Researcher of the Month, Professor Cara Swit, has published a fascinating study exploring the experiences and perceptions of children aged six to nine about their parents’ device use at home and its impact on them.

    Schools and businesses

    Let's get started

    Get in touch